...it's like TV Tropes, but LINKED DATA!

Siskel & Ebert

853 statements
158 feature instances
15 referencing feature instances

Siskel & Ebert	type	TVTItem
Siskel & Ebert	label	Siskel & Ebert
Siskel & Ebert	page	SiskelAndEbert
Siskel & Ebert	comment	Siskel & Ebert (Siskel & Ebert & the Movies in its first season) was a First-Run Syndication American television series that ran from 1986 to 1999. It was a continuation of three previous shows that Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert did together: Opening Soon...at a Theater Near You on Chicago PBS affiliate WTTW (1975-77); Sneak Previews (1977-82), a renamed version of the first show that went national on PBS in 1978 and became massively popular; and At the Movies (1982-86), the first show they did after leaving public television for syndication (Sneak Previews and At the Movies both continued for several years with different hosts after Siskel and Ebert left, but eventually folded). All of the shows had the same basic format: Siskel and Ebert, film critics for rival Chicago newspapers (Siskel at the Chicago Tribune, Ebert at the Chicago Sun-Times), discuss and debate the week's new films. Roughly four or five films were critiqued per episode. It usually ended with a special segment like "Video/Laserdisc Pick of the Week/Month", an interview with a celebrity or director, or a short-lived segment where viewers wrote in to provide a second opinion or correct S&E about something. The show taped at ABC's Chicago affiliate, WLS-TV, which is also where The Oprah Winfrey Show initially taped as well.Occasionally, they would devote an entire episode to one issue in film: Their stance against colorization, against fullscreen cropping of widescreen films (and vice versa when it came to older Disney animated films), trends they noticed in film (such as directors influenced by Quentin Tarantino) and spotlights on whom they considered rising stars or directors. They even spent an entire episode analyzing who had the better filmography: Woody Allen or Mel Brooks? Most notable, however, were the annual "Memo to the Academy" (where Siskel and Ebert recommend what they think should be nominated for Oscars) and the "Best of" and "Worst of" the year lists, the latter of which were quite entertaining as they got to trash the bad films one last time. An annual hour-long special, hosted before a studio audience at a Disney resort, was devoted to "If We Picked the Winners," in which the critics discussed who they would pick for the upcoming Oscars if they were members of the Academy.Siskel and Ebert's claim to fame was their method of reviewing movies, ultimately boiling down to a simple thumbs up or downnote a simple "yes" or "no" vote, respectively, during the PBS years. There was no middle ground, so it was interesting seeing them rationalize choosing either one or the other. And of course, when you have two major film critics from rival newspapers together, disagreements could occur. And the debates were some of the most fun moments in the show. Heck, sometimes the two would bicker on some small detail even if they both agreed on the film's merit!Unfortunately, in early 1998, Gene Siskel was absent for a few weeks due to getting surgery for a brain tumor. Despite this, he was still able to phone in his reviews (literally!) and debate with Roger via a split screen and a still image of his face on one side. When Siskel returned, he was noticeably less animated and expressive, talking slower, and seemed to debate with Roger less. Nevertheless, he stuck with the show until early 1999 when he went back into surgery and, sadly, never came out. Gene Siskel died on February 20, 1999, and while the show continued under a few different banners and with different critics (Roger Ebert & the Movies, Ebert & Roeper, At the Movies), the Siskel & Ebert show was finished. Roger Ebert devoted an entire episode to Gene Siskel following his death, and it's clear that even though the two frequently disagreed, they didn't hate each other.Ebert continued the show, first as Roger Ebert & the Movies with guest cohosts, and then as At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper with the addition of his Sun-Times colleague Richard Roeper. Ebert stopped appearing on the show in 2006 because he lost the ability to speak due to his cancer and Roeper continued with guests until the two were removed from the show by their distributor, Disney-ABC Domestic Television, in 2008. They were replaced by Ben Lyons (son of film critic Jeffery Lyons) and film critic and Turner Classic Movies presenter Ben Mankiewicz (now part of The Young Turks' What the Flick?!) in a move to skew to younger audience. While most of the old fanbase of the show had no problem with Ben Mankiewicz, almost all of them (and Ebert himself) took issue with Ben Lyons' skill, ethics, and taste. The two Bens were fired from the show a little over a year later. The critics were replaced one final time with critic A.O. Scott (critic for the New York Times) and Michael Phillips (of Siskel's Chicago Tribune), choices Ebert expressed satisfaction with, despite no longer being associated with the show. However, these two hosts only lasted from August 2009 to March 2010, when Disney-ABC simply pulled the plug on the show, ending the Siskel & Ebert TV legacy for good.... Or so we thought. Later in 2010, Ebert announced he had purchased the rights to the show and had taken it back to PBS. His new Ebert Presents: At the Movies began airing in January 2011, with Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of Mubi (who now writes for The Onion's AV Club) and Christy Lemire of the Associated Press (as with Mankiewicz, now a part of What the Flick?!) as the new critics. Ebert himself made appearances on the show, with Bill Curtis narrating his recent written reviews, as well as occasional narrations by Werner Herzog. The show was a ratings success, but due to funding problems it went on permanent hiatus at the end of 2011. Ebert died of cancer on April 4, 2013. A joint biography of Siskel and Ebert and a history of their show, Opposable Thumbs by Matt Singer, was published in 2023.
Siskel & Ebert	fetched	2024-04-11T19:00:45Z
Siskel & Ebert	parsed	2024-04-11T19:00:45Z
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Animaniacs: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Armageddon1998: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to BallisticEcksVsSever: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to BarbWire: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Benji: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Blade: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to BrokenArrow1996: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to ButchCassidyAndTheSundanceKid: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to CallBack: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Carnosaur: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to DontBeAMenaceToSouthCentralWhileDrinkingYourJuiceInTheHood: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to DoubleDragon1994: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to FridayThe13thTheFinalChapter: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to FullMetalJacket: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to GameraGuardianOfTheUniverse: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Garfield: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Godzilla1998: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to GoodBurger: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to GushingAboutShowsYouLike: Not a Feature - IGNORE
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to HannahAndHerSisters: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to HomeAlone3: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to JudgeDredd: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to KidsInTheHallBrainCandy: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Kingpin: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to LeonardPart6: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to LesMiserables1995: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to LittleNemoAdventuresInSlumberland: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to LostHighway: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to MichaelJackson: Not a Feature - IGNORE
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to MichaelJacksonsThriller: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to MickeysChristmasCarol: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to MrMagoo: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Mulan: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to OnDeadlyGround: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Outbreak: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to PrinceOfDarkness: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Sahara2005: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to ScoobyDoo: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Screamers: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to SheHateMe: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Shoah: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to SilverBullet: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to SoBadItsGood: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to SpaceJam: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to StarKid: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TeenWolf: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TenThousandBC: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TheCritic: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TheDoors1991: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TheLordOfTheRingsTheFellowshipOfTheRing: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TheMightyDucks: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to TheWizard: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to ThreeNinjas: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to Xtro: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	processingComment	Dropped link to emmanuelle: Not a Feature - ITEM
Siskel & Ebert	isPartOf	DBTropes
Siskel & Ebert / int_1282bf4f	type	No Celebrities Were Harmed
Siskel & Ebert / int_1282bf4f	comment	No Celebrities Were Harmed: Siskel and Ebert were spoofed in many shows, usually in a Take That, Critics! kind of way: The 1998 American version of Godzilla had the mayor of New York City as an Ebert lookalike (campaign slogan: "Thumbs Up for New York!") with an aide named Gene, who criticizes the mayor's decision to exploit the disaster with a "thumbs down." (Siskel and Ebert had criticized Emmerich's earlier productions.) Siskel said the caricature was "petty," and Ebert complained, not that he felt insulted, but that he was in a Godzilla film and didn't get to be eaten or squashed by the monster. A segment in Animaniacs featured obvious caricatures "Codger Egbert and Lean Hisskill" as a pair of TV critics who are tormented by Slappy and Skippy Squirrel for rating Slappy's cartoons "two stinky toes down." Averted when Roger and Gene played themselves on The Critic episode "Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice".
Siskel & Ebert / int_1282bf4f	featureApplicability	-1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_1282bf4f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_1282bf4f
Siskel & Ebert / int_13d7a65e	type	The Artifact
Siskel & Ebert / int_13d7a65e	comment	The Artifact: The 2007-2008 season was titled At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper. Despite this, the on-air graphics still used the Ebert & Roeper title. Ebert's name continuing to be in the title for that season could also qualify, as he didn't appear in that season due to his surgeries, though he was still under contract with Disney at the time.
Siskel & Ebert / int_13d7a65e	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_13d7a65e	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_13d7a65e
Siskel & Ebert / int_141b5985	type	Morning Routine
Siskel & Ebert / int_141b5985	comment	Morning Routine: The opening to Siskel & Ebert: The duo write their reviews for their respective newspapers, and head for the news stands where the papers with their reviews are being delivered, followed by the two heading into the theater while arguing with each other about each others' reviews.
Siskel & Ebert / int_141b5985	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_141b5985	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_141b5985
Siskel & Ebert / int_146f4e0	type	Blind Without 'Em
Siskel & Ebert / int_146f4e0	comment	Blind Without 'Em: In their review of the live action Mr. Magoo, Ebert readily admits that he's as nearsighted as they come, but was never offended by Mr. Magoo, and certainly didn't think the disclaimer at the end of the film (which defended nearsighted and blind people) was necessary.
Siskel & Ebert / int_146f4e0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_146f4e0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_146f4e0
Siskel & Ebert / int_15756c9d	type	Where It All Began
Siskel & Ebert / int_15756c9d	comment	Where It All Began: In 1975, Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert began their career as televised film reviewers at the same place Roger ended his in 2011: on the Chicago-area PBS station, WTTW.
Siskel & Ebert / int_15756c9d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_15756c9d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_15756c9d
Siskel & Ebert / int_17ce80aa	type	All There in the Manual
Siskel & Ebert / int_17ce80aa	comment	All There in the Manual: In their review of Dumb and Dumber, Ebert said that one of the jokes in the movie made him laugh so hard that he almost had to be hospitalized. He didn't elaborate which scene he was referring to, but in his print review for the Sun-Times, it was the scene with the blind kid and the dead parakeet.
Siskel & Ebert / int_17ce80aa	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_17ce80aa	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_17ce80aa
Siskel & Ebert / int_18d15922	type	Title Drop
Siskel & Ebert / int_18d15922	comment	The "two Bens" and Phillips/Scott eras went under the name "At the Movies" (a title introduced in the 2007-2008 season) and dropped the traditional balcony seating, leaving the chairs the hosts sat on along with a table. The sign-off "Until then, the balcony is closed" was replaced with "Until then, we'll see you at the movies".
Siskel & Ebert / int_18d15922	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_18d15922	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_18d15922
Siskel & Ebert / int_19ebddab	type	Guilty Pleasures
Siskel & Ebert / int_19ebddab	comment	Guilty Pleasures: Ebert has been known to give certain movies thumbs up, even if he admits they're ridiculous and/or not as good of quality as other films. Examples: Congo, Gamera: Guardian of the Universe. Michael Phillips gave a "see it" to 10,000 BC. Siskel gave a surprising thumbs up to Armageddon (1998)note Ebert's eventual pick for 1998's worst film, saying the lightning fast editing and constant camera movement actually amused him after a while. Siskel also liked Lambada despite admitting its faults, which resulted in being chewed out by Ebert for being too soft.
Siskel & Ebert / int_19ebddab	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_19ebddab	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_19ebddab
Siskel & Ebert / int_1ba8eb64	type	Visual Pun
Siskel & Ebert / int_1ba8eb64	comment	Visual Pun: Sneak Previews featured Spot, the Wonder Dog. At the Movies days featured Aroma, the Educated Skunk. Respectively, they represented segments talking about the dogs and stinkers of a given week or year (including a parody of the famous MGM logo, where a barking Spot replaces a roaring Leo under the banner "Major Garbage Movies"). These were excised when they moved to the Buena Vista series. During a 1992 interview on Late Night with David Letterman, Gene recalled working with the skunk.
Siskel & Ebert / int_1ba8eb64	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_1ba8eb64	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_1ba8eb64
Siskel & Ebert / int_1bc2e445	type	End of an Age
Siskel & Ebert / int_1bc2e445	comment	End of an Age: The 1999 episode featuring At First Sight, Another Day in Paradise, The Hi-Lo Country, Playing by Heart, and The Theory of Flight was Gene's final episode.
Siskel & Ebert / int_1bc2e445	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_1bc2e445	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_1bc2e445
Siskel & Ebert / int_1c3e4c9	type	Gratuitous Animal Sidekick
Siskel & Ebert / int_1c3e4c9	comment	Gratuitous Animal Sidekick: Spot, the Wonder Dog (Sneak Previews), who was followed up by Aroma, the Educated Skunk (At the Movies).
Siskel & Ebert / int_1c3e4c9	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_1c3e4c9	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_1c3e4c9
Siskel & Ebert / int_1e7487cd	type	Breaking the Fourth Wall
Siskel & Ebert / int_1e7487cd	comment	Breaking the Fourth Wall: In their "Worst of 1995" show, during their mention of Judge Dredd, Siskel talked to the camera as if addressing Sylvester Stallone. When reviewing French Twist, Siskel also broke the fourth wall when he addressed the country of France by talking into the camera: When Ebert and Roeper reviewed Garfield 2: A Tale of Two Kitties, Ebert directly addressed any kids who might be watching the show, ignoring Roeper (who was laughing incredulously that Roger was giving it thumbs up). Siskel spoke into camera and personally thanked the Farrelly Brothers for their film Kingpin.
Siskel & Ebert / int_1e7487cd	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_1e7487cd	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_1e7487cd
Siskel & Ebert / int_203f069d	type	Tongue-Tied
Siskel & Ebert / int_203f069d	comment	Tongue-Tied: Siskel had a tendency toward this, and Ebert sometimes poked fun at him for it. In his intro to 1987's Prince of Darkness, he called himself out on it: When reviewing Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood, Ebert said that if the movie had been made by white people, it would've been labeled racist. Siskel meant to retort this by repeating it, but got tripped up:
Siskel & Ebert / int_203f069d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_203f069d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_203f069d
Siskel & Ebert / int_21586e8c	type	Padding
Siskel & Ebert / int_21586e8c	comment	Padding: Invoked when they reviewed Ace Ventura When Nature Calls:
Siskel & Ebert / int_21586e8c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_21586e8c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_21586e8c
Siskel & Ebert / int_230d64	type	Screw the Rules, I Have Money!
Siskel & Ebert / int_230d64	comment	Outside of the movies themselves, Siskel was rumored to have had no tolerance whatsoever for parents who bring their babies to a theater and don't take them out when they started crying, and was willing to go so far as to pay them to leave if they didn't.
Siskel & Ebert / int_230d64	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_230d64	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_230d64
Siskel & Ebert / int_25f33d8	type	Sick Episode
Siskel & Ebert / int_25f33d8	comment	Sick Episode: For a few weeks in early 1998, Siskel was in the hospital recovering from surgery; instead of sitting out entirely, he still reviewed the films from his hospital bed, using a split-screen format with a still shot of Siskel on the left. In early 1999, Siskel was absent entirely during one episode, due to returning to the hospital. Ebert did the episode by himself.
Siskel & Ebert / int_25f33d8	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_25f33d8	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_25f33d8
Siskel & Ebert / int_264a140b	type	Fat and Skinny
Siskel & Ebert / int_264a140b	comment	Fat and Skinny: Ebert and Siskel, respectively.
Siskel & Ebert / int_264a140b	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_264a140b	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_264a140b
Siskel & Ebert / int_2711e392	type	The Complainer Is Always Wrong
Siskel & Ebert / int_2711e392	comment	The Complainer Is Always Wrong: In the special episode "The Movie That Made Us Critics", Siskel told a story about how one of his first professional reviews was for Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. He thought there were some cute moments but overall found it underwhelming and gave it a negative review (to which Ebert agreed). A fellow employee came across his review before it was published and was shocked that he'd give a negative review to a Paul Newman movie. Conflicted, Siskel went back to see the movie a second time and didn't like it any more than he did the first time (and actually, liked it less because he saw everything coming). That was an early lesson he learned as a critic: Alluded to in their review of Outbreak when Ebert said that Siskel was probably the only one who thought Dustin Hoffman looked ridiculous in his lab coat (Siskel thought he looked like Benjamin Braddock in it).
Siskel & Ebert / int_2711e392	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_2711e392	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_2711e392
Siskel & Ebert / int_2719ab04	type	Special Guest
Siskel & Ebert / int_2719ab04	comment	Special Guest: Some of the guest critics may count (such as Jay Leno and Kevin Smith during the Roeper era). Also, Bill Clinton (a famous movie buff) appeared in one episode where he was interviewed by Roger. The transcript for that interview can be read here.
Siskel & Ebert / int_2719ab04	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_2719ab04	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_2719ab04
Siskel & Ebert / int_28a1d0b	type	Sunk Cost Fallacy
Siskel & Ebert / int_28a1d0b	comment	Sunk Cost Fallacy: Referenced when they reviewed She's Out of Control.
Siskel & Ebert / int_28a1d0b	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_28a1d0b	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_28a1d0b
Siskel & Ebert / int_29c480a3	type	Good News, Bad News
Siskel & Ebert / int_29c480a3	comment	Good News, Bad News: When reviewing The Hot Chick: In the recap of The Wizard:
Siskel & Ebert / int_29c480a3	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_29c480a3	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_29c480a3
Siskel & Ebert / int_2a7e7af1	type	Limited Wardrobe
Siskel & Ebert / int_2a7e7af1	comment	Limited Wardrobe: Throughout the entire run, the typical outfit for both Siskel and Ebert was a blazer with a turtleneck underneath. However, there have been exceptions: Both wore tuxedos for some of their "Best of" shows, and Ebert wore a suit and tie for his Gene Siskel tribute episode. Perhaps the biggest aversion occurred in a special 1994 episode "Sunny Side of the Screen", where they both wore blazers with Hawaiian shirts underneath.
Siskel & Ebert / int_2a7e7af1	featureApplicability	-1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_2a7e7af1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_2a7e7af1
Siskel & Ebert / int_2c3ff5e8	type	Truncated Theme Tune
Siskel & Ebert / int_2c3ff5e8	comment	Truncated Theme Tune: The remaining episodes in the 1998-1999 season after Gene's passing cut the intro short after the title graphic. Later episodes in the 1999-2000 season and most of Richard's first season shortened the Roger Ebert & the Movies theme.
Siskel & Ebert / int_2c3ff5e8	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_2c3ff5e8	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_2c3ff5e8
Siskel & Ebert / int_2ef005ab	type	Vocal Evolution
Siskel & Ebert / int_2ef005ab	comment	Vocal Evolution: Due to throat surgery, Ebert's voice changed in late 2003/early 2004, sounding more nasal and slightly slurred.
Siskel & Ebert / int_2ef005ab	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_2ef005ab	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_2ef005ab
Siskel & Ebert / int_31a2a33c	type	Stuff Blowing Up
Siskel & Ebert / int_31a2a33c	comment	Stuff Blowing Up: Frequently cited as a negative in the films they review, as it often emphasizes meaningless special effects over story. For example, in their review of On Deadly Ground: Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever was similarly bashed as a "cynical exercise that... couldn't care less about any of its characters".
Siskel & Ebert / int_31a2a33c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_31a2a33c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_31a2a33c
Siskel & Ebert / int_3297cfbb	type	Evolving Credits
Siskel & Ebert / int_3297cfbb	comment	Evolving Credits: Opening Soon...at a Theater Near You opened with a montage of stills of various Hollywood icons. Sneak Previews had a comical scene set at a movie theater, where a Faceless patron buys a ticket labeled "Sneak Previews", a tub of popcorn with Roger Ebert's name on it, a box of candy with Gene Siskel's name on it, and has a "Sneak Previews" paper cup get stuck in a faulty drink dispenser. At the Movies had the pair in the opening for the first time, separately arriving at a theater and delivering sight gags as they make their way through the lobby (Siskel sneaking in popcorn and other snacks inside his briefcase, Ebert buying a notebook in a snack vending machine) before they head up to the balcony. Siskel & Ebert showed a Day in the Life of its hosts, working at their respective newspapers, ending with them arguing about each other's reviews as they head to the theater.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3297cfbb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3297cfbb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3297cfbb
Siskel & Ebert / int_3425e0bf	type	Milestone Celebration
Siskel & Ebert / int_3425e0bf	comment	Milestone Celebration: The 500th episode of their show was a live full-hour performance as Disney's Hollywood Studios, where they discussed their careers and imitators.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3425e0bf	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3425e0bf	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3425e0bf
Siskel & Ebert / int_351b8442	type	Disney Owns This Trope
Siskel & Ebert / int_351b8442	comment	Disney Owns This Trope: They trademarked the phrase "two thumbs up", and their estates still own it. In his 2023 biography of the duo, Opposable Thuimbs, author Matt Singer mentions this and pleads with any would-be reviewers to avoid using that phrase in their reviews of the book for that reason.
Siskel & Ebert / int_351b8442	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_351b8442	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_351b8442
Siskel & Ebert / int_35b241c0	type	Ooh, Me Accent's Slipping
Siskel & Ebert / int_35b241c0	comment	Ooh, Me Accent's Slipping: One of Roeper's criticisms of Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, claiming that Angelina Jolie's British accent slips in and out.
Siskel & Ebert / int_35b241c0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_35b241c0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_35b241c0
Siskel & Ebert / int_360aa1f	type	Fan Disillusionment
Siskel & Ebert / int_360aa1f	comment	Fan Disillusionment: Siskel hated She's Out of Control so much that he briefly considered quitting reviewing movies, feeling the movies had failed him. Luckily, later that day he saw Say Anything... and all was right with the world. Ebert completely understood what Siskel felt and emphasized that Siskel was not joking.
Siskel & Ebert / int_360aa1f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_360aa1f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_360aa1f
Siskel & Ebert / int_372a75a0	type	Bile Fascination
Siskel & Ebert / int_372a75a0	comment	Bile Fascination: invoked Mentioned in their review of Frozen Assets. When Ebert said the movie may be the worst comedy ever made, Siskel (who hated the movie just as much as Ebert did) pointed out that the filmmakers could use that quote to make people want to see it.
Siskel & Ebert / int_372a75a0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_372a75a0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_372a75a0
Siskel & Ebert / int_37a6a66a	type	Instrumental Theme Tune
Siskel & Ebert / int_37a6a66a	comment	Instrumental Theme Tune: Used throughout all incarnations of the show.
Siskel & Ebert / int_37a6a66a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_37a6a66a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_37a6a66a
Siskel & Ebert / int_39ed1c8a	type	Conspiracy Theorist
Siskel & Ebert / int_39ed1c8a	comment	Conspiracy Theorist: Played for Laughs in the infamous outtakes. Siskel, in a very tongue-in-cheek manner, rails against WASPs, claiming they run the country, and Ebert name-drops the "international bankers" and the Vatican, before they realize that, with Siskel being Jewish and Ebert being Catholic, they shouldn't be Boomerang Bigots and should team up against the WASPs.
Siskel & Ebert / int_39ed1c8a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_39ed1c8a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_39ed1c8a
Siskel & Ebert / int_3cebf628	type	Irishman and a Jew
Siskel & Ebert / int_3cebf628	comment	Irishman and a Jew: Ebert was part Irish on his mother's side, and grew up staunchly Catholic, while Siskel was the son of Jewish immigrants from Russia.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3cebf628	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3cebf628	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3cebf628
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d038b36	type	Rhetorical Question Blunder
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d038b36	comment	Rhetorical Question Blunder: In their "Worst of 1995" show, Siskel criticized Sylvester Stallone for doing Judge Dredd:
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d038b36	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d038b36	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3d038b36
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d5c5deb	type	Flat Character
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d5c5deb	comment	Flat Character: Their criticism of George Jetson in their review of Jetsons: The Movie: Gene called him a "dullard". Similarly, Gene really resented the main character in Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland, as most of his dialogue merely consisted of exclamations.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d5c5deb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3d5c5deb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3d5c5deb
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e007d5d	type	Title, Please!
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e007d5d	comment	Title, Please!: No episode titles are present on the screen. Episodes are unofficially referred to as "Week of ____" and/or the movies they reviewed on that episode. Averted with their annual "Best of...", "Worst of...", "Memo to the Academy", and "If We Picked the Winners" shows.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e007d5d	featureApplicability	-1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e007d5d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3e007d5d
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e5f74c	type	Take That, Critics!
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e5f74c	comment	Take That, Critics!: For their "Worst of 1993" episode, both Roger and Gene selected a film the other enjoyed as the year's worst film: Roger selected Carnosaur; Gene selected Cop and a Half. When both Roger and Gene disliked 1997's Lost Highway, some of that film's promotional posters proclaimed "Two thumbs down!" with pride.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e5f74c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3e5f74c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3e5f74c
Siskel & Ebert / int_3ea462d7	type	Take That, Audience!
Siskel & Ebert / int_3ea462d7	comment	Take That, Audience!: In the short-lived "Viewer's Thumb" segment, one viewer disagreed with their thumbs up of the wildlife documentary Microcosmos, claiming it was boring and slow. Siskel retorted by saying the viewer had a short attention span due to lack of reading and watching frenetic television shows.
Siskel & Ebert / int_3ea462d7	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_3ea462d7	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_3ea462d7
Siskel & Ebert / int_43273c71	type	LongRunner
Siskel & Ebert / int_43273c71	comment	Long Runner: The show in its various incarnations ran from 1975 to 2011.
Siskel & Ebert / int_43273c71	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_43273c71	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_43273c71
Siskel & Ebert / int_45bc787c	type	Mundane Wish
Siskel & Ebert / int_45bc787c	comment	Mundane Wish: In their review of Frozen Assets (which both would name the worst film of 1992), Ebert said that as a reward for having to view this film, he deserved months "in a beautiful valley with honey and nectar and zephyr-like breezes". Siskel joked that he had simple tastes, to which Ebert added: "...And a big car!"
Siskel & Ebert / int_45bc787c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_45bc787c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_45bc787c
Siskel & Ebert / int_4766ca14	type	Volleying Insults
Siskel & Ebert / int_4766ca14	comment	Volleying Insults: Would occur at times on the Ebert & Roeper version. Ebert gave thumbs up to A Prairie Home Companion, saying you just want to cuddle the movie, and when Roeper gave it a thumbs down: And of course this one from their review of Sahara (Ebert liked it, Roeper didn't):
Siskel & Ebert / int_4766ca14	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_4766ca14	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_4766ca14
Siskel & Ebert / int_4f4372e9	type	Early-Installment Weirdness
Siskel & Ebert / int_4f4372e9	comment	Early-Installment Weirdness: Nothing major, as the show stayed roughly the same since it began in 1986, but there were still some differences: The first season was titled Siskel & Ebert & The Movies. The title was shortened to Siskel & Ebert in 1987. Likewise, the Ebert & Roeper incarnation was titled Ebert & Roeper and The Movies in its first season. The very first episodes had the "Coming Up" teasers consisted simply of movie clips. They were changed to animations of filmstrips incorporating footage from the films as the announcer (later Siskel and Ebert) introduces the movies. In 1992, the show's backdrop switched from a yellow-ish hue to a blue one. Also, in the pre-1990s shows, Ebert had thicker glasses and bushier hair. During the show's earliest incarnation in the 1970s, Siskel had a thick mustache. Also, their earliest episodes together had them speaking in a much more mellow manner, compared to their more energetic personalities later on. Until 1977, Sneak Previews was originally called Opening Soon...at a Theater Near You and until 1978 it was only broadcast locally in Chicago (with a few regional Midwest affiliates picking it up after its early success). Sneak Previews didn't use the trademark thumbs up and down yet; the votes were merely "yes" or "no". In the show's 1970s incarnation, the pair occasionally reviewed pornos. Neither Siskel or Ebert were featured in the opening sequence to Sneak Previews; they would be starting with At the Movies. Up until about 1985, Gene and Roger would introduce each other ("Across the aisle from me, Gene Siskel.") rather than the more familiar method of introducing themselves ("I'm Roger Ebert."). The Ebert & Roeper era initially used the Siskel & Ebert set, but with alterations, as well as the Roger Ebert & the Movies theme. The theme song was rearranged in early 2001, while the set was redesigned the following season.
Siskel & Ebert / int_4f4372e9	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_4f4372e9	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_4f4372e9
Siskel & Ebert / int_51923571	type	Spinning Paper
Siskel & Ebert / int_51923571	comment	Spinning Paper: Seen in the beginning of the intro.
Siskel & Ebert / int_51923571	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_51923571	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_51923571
Siskel & Ebert / int_54cbd0cb	type	This Is Unforgivable!
Siskel & Ebert / int_54cbd0cb	comment	This Is Unforgivable!: Ebert's remark about Patch Adams.
Siskel & Ebert / int_54cbd0cb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_54cbd0cb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_54cbd0cb
Siskel & Ebert / int_553c27bb	type	Sliding Scale of Silliness vs. Seriousness
Siskel & Ebert / int_553c27bb	comment	Sliding Scale of Silliness vs. Seriousness: An occasional defense used for a positive review on the show, such as Congo and The Fast and the Furious.
Siskel & Ebert / int_553c27bb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_553c27bb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_553c27bb
Siskel & Ebert / int_5aa4ec8a	type	Ambiguous Syntax
Siskel & Ebert / int_5aa4ec8a	comment	Ambiguous Syntax: From their Telling Lies in America review, Siskel gave it a marginal thumbs down. Ebert argued, "Gimme Bacon. Come on, gimme Bacon." Siskel chuckled and remarked that he wasn't sure at first what he meant by that. Understandably, it sounded like Ebert was asking for some bacon to eat.
Siskel & Ebert / int_5aa4ec8a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_5aa4ec8a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_5aa4ec8a
Siskel & Ebert / int_5c9ccf46	type	One of the Kids
Siskel & Ebert / int_5c9ccf46	comment	One of the Kids: Ebert called himself "eternally young" when he gave a positive review to Garfield 2: A Tale of Two Kitties. In Siskel and Ebert's review of Star Kid, Ebert liked the film because he was in touch with the child inside himself.
Siskel & Ebert / int_5c9ccf46	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_5c9ccf46	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_5c9ccf46
Siskel & Ebert / int_5f4097ba	type	Not Distracted by the Sexy
Siskel & Ebert / int_5f4097ba	comment	Not Distracted by the Sexy: Siskel derided the sex scene in Disclosure, saying it was unrealistic for the boss to sleep with an employee on the first night:note Siskel must not have been paying attention, as the sex scene, and the fact that she's doing this on their first day working together, is in fact very plot-relevant The same went for Barb Wire; Siskel got annoyed at Pamela Anderson's "assets" being shoved in his face.
Siskel & Ebert / int_5f4097ba	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_5f4097ba	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_5f4097ba
Siskel & Ebert / int_5ff56a1f	type	Long List
Siskel & Ebert / int_5ff56a1f	comment	Long List: In their review of Kids in the Hall: Brain Candy, Ebert rattled off a list of adjectives as to why he hates the film: "Three Wishes has its heart in the right place, but the plot is all over the map. I'm afraid the brain is missing. The movie might've been better if it had simplified its storyline, and not tried to deal with homeless men, baseball, romance, cancer, aliens from outer space, magic fireworks, people who are missing in action, and the small town resentment of outsiders. I think- I did cover baseball, okay." Gene gave one when reviewing Silver Bullet:
Siskel & Ebert / int_5ff56a1f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_5ff56a1f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_5ff56a1f
Siskel & Ebert / int_62a2d3d7	type	Sequelitis
Siskel & Ebert / int_62a2d3d7	comment	Sequelitis:invoked A major sticking point for them... their "Worst of 1983" show was devoted entirely to sequels, and most of their "Worst of..." specials to follow would have a special segment devoted to mediocre sequels.
Siskel & Ebert / int_62a2d3d7	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_62a2d3d7	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_62a2d3d7
Siskel & Ebert / int_632f6b5b	type	Guest Host
Siskel & Ebert / int_632f6b5b	comment	Guest Host: Tom Shales filled in for Gene Siskel when he went in for brain surgery in 1999. After Siskel died, Ebert tried numerous other guest hosts in 1999 until finally deciding on Richard Roeper in 2000 as permanent replacement co-host. After Ebert left the show to deal with his operations in 2006, Roeper cycled through various guest hosts throughout the next two years (some being critics like Robert Wilonsky and Christy Lemire, some being entertainers like Jay Leno or Kevin Smith) before settling on Michael Phillips as a permanent co-host for the last few months of his tenure.
Siskel & Ebert / int_632f6b5b	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_632f6b5b	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_632f6b5b
Siskel & Ebert / int_64972c10	type	Flashback Effects
Siskel & Ebert / int_64972c10	comment	Flashback Effects: In Ebert and Roeper's review of Scooby-Doo 2, Ebert recalled his review of the first film, and the picture dissolves to his and Roeper's earlier review. The same occurred when they reviewed Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties.
Siskel & Ebert / int_64972c10	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_64972c10	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_64972c10
Siskel & Ebert / int_6627695f	type	Author Appeal
Siskel & Ebert / int_6627695f	comment	Author Appeal: In Siskel's case, he pointed out that he loved doing the show because it combined three things he passionately loved: movies, television and journalism. One Viewer's Thumb entry claimed that the only reason the duo gave Space Jam two thumbs up is because Michael Jordan is from Chicago, where the show was filmed, which might seem like Insane Troll Logic until you recall that Siskel was a huge Chicago Bulls fan (Ebert didn't much care for sports, despite having began his career as a sportswriter).
Siskel & Ebert / int_6627695f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6627695f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6627695f
Siskel & Ebert / int_670db7d7	type	Formula-Breaking Episode
Siskel & Ebert / int_670db7d7	comment	Formula-Breaking Episode: As stated in the intro paragraphs, some episodes take a break from reviewing new movies and focus on a specific issue (colorization, "What's Wrong With Home Video", favorite villains, guilty pleasures, etc.). Sometimes a standard-format episode would have a segment briefly discussing a hot film-related topic along with the usual reviews; in late 1991 they discussed the controversy over Michael Jackson's "Black or White" video — specifically its violent, crotch-grabbing finale. They weren't so much bothered by that as the fact that they had no idea what was going on in the video. The music video for Michael Jackson's Thriller was reviewed alongside the regular movie fare in January 1984. They panned the video, claiming it relied on stock special effects that weren't scary, minimizing the music or the iconic dance sequence. The tribute to Gene Siskel episode didn't feature any movie reviews at all, a rarity for the show. The duo never reviewed TV shows, but they made an exception with The Critic, due to its subject matter. They reviewed the first three episodes and gave it a marginal thumbs down. However, they sensed promise in the premise and felt the show should stay focused on satirizing movies. They eventually guest-voiced a second-season episode ("Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice") which parodied many film tropes to break the two apart and bring them together again. Similarly, the duo rarely reviewed made-for-TV movies but occasionally they made an exception, such as when they reviewed The Rat Pack. Any episode where they focused on one director or actor, such as an episode all about Robert Redford. Similarly, any episode analyzing one movie, such as Forrest Gump, Pulp Fiction, The Phantom Menace, and Eyes Wide Shut. The episode from 2000 when Roger interviewed Bill Clinton. No new movie reviews, just a discussion with a (now former) president about his favorite movies.
Siskel & Ebert / int_670db7d7	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_670db7d7	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_670db7d7
Siskel & Ebert / int_6a1cc0cd	type	Bad Mood as an Excuse
Siskel & Ebert / int_6a1cc0cd	comment	Bad Mood as an Excuse: Occasionally, if there's a sharp disagreement on a film, the one who gave thumbs up will accuse the one who gave thumbs down of being in a bad mood the day they saw the movie, and letting that cloud their judgment.
Siskel & Ebert / int_6a1cc0cd	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6a1cc0cd	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6a1cc0cd
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ab0780e	type	Eight Deadly Words
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ab0780e	comment	Eight Deadly Words: Invoked: A common criticism if they dislike a movie- when reviewing The Big Squeeze, Roger said he didn't care about the characters so he was bored.
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ab0780e	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ab0780e	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6ab0780e
Siskel & Ebert / int_6b35bdff	type	Serious Business
Siskel & Ebert / int_6b35bdff	comment	Serious Business: While the duo sometimes exchanged funny banter, for the most part the duo took film criticism very seriously, even occasionally accusing each other of lowering their standards (see the Predator review). This is perhaps why they gained such a reputation as an authority on what are the best films to see (to the point where "Two thumbs up!" was practically a given to mention in ads or on video covers).
Siskel & Ebert / int_6b35bdff	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6b35bdff	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6b35bdff
Siskel & Ebert / int_6db06839	type	The Stoner
Siskel & Ebert / int_6db06839	comment	The Stoner: Roeper accused adult SpongeBob fans of being on drugs in their review of The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie.
Siskel & Ebert / int_6db06839	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6db06839	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6db06839
Siskel & Ebert / int_6e0a57d6	type	Like an Old Married Couple
Siskel & Ebert / int_6e0a57d6	comment	Like an Old Married Couple: Their arguments could fall into this quite often; the two had been paired together so long that they knew what made the other tick and jumped on that. And while they did argue, they also kidded each other just as much.
Siskel & Ebert / int_6e0a57d6	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6e0a57d6	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6e0a57d6
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ef9d3fe	type	Christmas Episode
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ef9d3fe	comment	Christmas Episode: For a while, Siskel and Ebert did an annual "Holiday Gift Guide" episode.
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ef9d3fe	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_6ef9d3fe	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_6ef9d3fe
Siskel & Ebert / int_7349ce5a	type	Sex Comedy
Siskel & Ebert / int_7349ce5a	comment	Sex Comedy: Both were not big fans of this genre, and even devoted a whole episode in 1983 to how many they were getting due to the success of Porky's. Later in the episode they clarified they don't mind this genre if it's done well, but too often it's not.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7349ce5a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7349ce5a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7349ce5a
Siskel & Ebert / int_762b9223	type	Played for Laughs
Siskel & Ebert / int_762b9223	comment	Played for Laughs in Ebert and Roeper's review of Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties. Richard said he didn't hate it as much as the first film; Roger (who gave thumbs up to the first film) ran with this remark:
Siskel & Ebert / int_762b9223	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_762b9223	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_762b9223
Siskel & Ebert / int_7775d0a5	type	Too Bleak, Stopped Caring
Siskel & Ebert / int_7775d0a5	comment	Too Bleak, Stopped Caring: Invoked a few times when the duo review a movie which is really dark. In one instance, Siskel admitted that the first time he saw 12 Monkeys, he disliked it because the grim future setting drained him and he shut down on the picture, but he watched it a second time with a more neutral viewpoint and liked it much better. Ebert couldn't recommend The Doors, despite that he admitted it was well-done. He thought watching Jim Morrison self-destruct on screen was hard to watch and recommended the soundtrack album instead. Siskel, who recommended the film, countered by observing that Ebert was clearly invested in the film if he felt bad about the main character. This was the duo's biggest complaint about Xtro, with Ebert outright labeling it one of the most depressing and mean-spirited films he'd ever seen in his career. Gene and Roger both disliked Screamers for this reason; Gene in particular railed against the filmmakers for making yet another dystopian sci-fi film and wished there was a film set in the future that was optimistic for once.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7775d0a5	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7775d0a5	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7775d0a5
Siskel & Ebert / int_7b21ef92	type	Later-Installment Weirdness
Siskel & Ebert / int_7b21ef92	comment	Later-Installment Weirdness: Towards the end of the Roeper & guest era, the thumbs up/down rating was replaced by See It, Rent It, or Skip It, as Disney/ABC refused to pay Ebert and the Siskel estate for continued use of the "Two Thumbs Up" trademark. The "two Bens" and Phillips/Scott eras went under the name "At the Movies" (a title introduced in the 2007-2008 season) and dropped the traditional balcony seating, leaving the chairs the hosts sat on along with a table. The sign-off "Until then, the balcony is closed" was replaced with "Until then, we'll see you at the movies". The second half of the 1998-1999 season is this, due to every episode containing a different guest host, due to Gene Siskel's sudden death. The 1999-2000 season also had this, but by then they had narrowed the stable a bit until they decided on Richard Roeper as Ebert's permanent co-host.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7b21ef92	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7b21ef92	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7b21ef92
Siskel & Ebert / int_7bc8c453	type	Origins Episode
Siskel & Ebert / int_7bc8c453	comment	Origins Episode: Their criticism of the The Beverly Hillbillies 1993 movie, since the TV show already covered it.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7bc8c453	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7bc8c453	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7bc8c453
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d04af5f	type	Completely Off-Topic Report
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d04af5f	comment	Completely Off-Topic Report: Can happen if the two go off on a tangent during the reviews. One of the more head-scratching ones was their "two thumbs up" review of Speed 2: Cruise Control, where they mostly debated whether Sandra Bullock was on-screen too much or not enough.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d04af5f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d04af5f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7d04af5f
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d89315b	type	"The Reason You Suck" Speech
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d89315b	comment	"The Reason You Suck" Speech: In their "Worst of 1995" show, Siskel and Ebert criticized the parents who took their kids to see Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers, when they could've taken them to better family movies instead.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d89315b	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7d89315b	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7d89315b
Siskel & Ebert / int_7f64efd5	type	Enforced Plug
Siskel & Ebert / int_7f64efd5	comment	Enforced Plug: When the Internet began to take off, Siskel and Ebert naturally got their own website, which led to one of the two plugging it at the end of every episode.
Siskel & Ebert / int_7f64efd5	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_7f64efd5	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_7f64efd5
Siskel & Ebert / int_8042e814	type	Actually Pretty Funny
Siskel & Ebert / int_8042e814	comment	Actually Pretty Funny: Siskel laughed twice during Dice Rules - the disabled parking joke and the shock at seeing a garter at a wedding.
Siskel & Ebert / int_8042e814	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_8042e814	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_8042e814
Siskel & Ebert / int_806eeaeb	type	Emotional Torque
Siskel & Ebert / int_806eeaeb	comment	Emotional Torque: Surprisingly used against An American Tail, which they criticized for being too dark and depressing for its Target Audience:
Siskel & Ebert / int_806eeaeb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_806eeaeb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_806eeaeb
Siskel & Ebert / int_83445b04	type	Pun
Siskel & Ebert / int_83445b04	comment	Pun: While the duo resisted using bad puns in their reviews, they occasionally let one slide. From the Mr. Magoo review: In their review of Home Alone 3, Siskel said the theme song for the movie should be "Dumbbells Keep Falling On My Head". In their review of Scooby-Doo 2, Ebert said: "Or, as it will certainly be known in France, "Scooby Doo Doo (Deux)".
Siskel & Ebert / int_83445b04	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_83445b04	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_83445b04
Siskel & Ebert / int_83b464fb	type	Straight Man
Siskel & Ebert / int_83b464fb	comment	Straight Man: While Ebert occasionally had some funny lines, Siskel was the more comedic of the two.
Siskel & Ebert / int_83b464fb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_83b464fb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_83b464fb
Siskel & Ebert / int_8411ab92	type	Red Oni, Blue Oni
Siskel & Ebert / int_8411ab92	comment	Red Oni, Blue Oni: Siskel (Red) was the more vocal one, prone to wisecracks, and often went to bat for things like lowbrow comedies or genre films that Ebert didn't care for. Ebert (Blue) was more restrained, more prone to dry sarcasm, and would defend more unconventional or arty movies that Siskel may not have liked. This was actually at odds with their backgrounds: Siskel was an Ivy Leaguer (Yale specifically), Ebert came from a working-class family.
Siskel & Ebert / int_8411ab92	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_8411ab92	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_8411ab92
Siskel & Ebert / int_85d084ac	type	Dump Months
Siskel & Ebert / int_85d084ac	comment	Dump Months: This is why January was usually reserved for their annual "Best of" and "Worst of" episodes, along with "Memo to the Academy". Late August was also a time usually reserved for reruns of "special" episodes from earlier in the season.
Siskel & Ebert / int_85d084ac	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_85d084ac	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_85d084ac
Siskel & Ebert / int_86e1653c	type	Working Through the Cold
Siskel & Ebert / int_86e1653c	comment	For a few weeks in early 1998, Siskel was in the hospital recovering from surgery; instead of sitting out entirely, he still reviewed the films from his hospital bed, using a split-screen format with a still shot of Siskel on the left.
Siskel & Ebert / int_86e1653c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_86e1653c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_86e1653c
Siskel & Ebert / int_8797239c	type	Bait-and-Switch
Siskel & Ebert / int_8797239c	comment	Bait-and-Switch: Gene gave a thumbs down to Mickey's Christmas Carol- when it came time for Roger to give his take, he seemed to be aghast that Gene dared to dislike it... only to reveal he was disappointed in it as well. See below for Roger's infuriated review of Leonard Part 6. Gene paused and responded, "Boy, you're really upset about this." Was his response before becoming equally infuriated as he insisted Cosby was actually funny and it was so infuriating to make a bad movie.
Siskel & Ebert / int_8797239c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_8797239c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_8797239c
Siskel & Ebert / int_884c48a6	type	Non-Answer
Siskel & Ebert / int_884c48a6	comment	Non-Answer: Twice in the series, Ebert resorted to this in the same context: When reviewing Double Dragon (1994), Ebert said kids might enjoy it but nobody else: A similar situation came up when they reviewed Good Burger, and Ebert accused Siskel of reviewing it as if the film were made for adults instead of the movie's target audience (kids who are fans of the Good Burger skits on All That):
Siskel & Ebert / int_884c48a6	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_884c48a6	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_884c48a6
Siskel & Ebert / int_89d001bf	type	Do Wrong, Right
Siskel & Ebert / int_89d001bf	comment	Do Wrong, Right: They're not happy about the parody they suffered in the Godzilla movie, but it's just because the writers didn't do anything imaginative against them, like have the monster squash them or something.
Siskel & Ebert / int_89d001bf	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_89d001bf	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_89d001bf
Siskel & Ebert / int_91495e52	type	Heads or Tails?
Siskel & Ebert / int_91495e52	comment	Heads or Tails?: Why is it "Siskel & Ebert" and not "Ebert & Siskel"? Ebert lost a coin flip.note As he often pointed out, his name is first alphabetically, he was the older of the two, and he won a Pulitzer Prize in 1975.
Siskel & Ebert / int_91495e52	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_91495e52	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_91495e52
Siskel & Ebert / int_950bbfa7	type	Take a Third Option
Siskel & Ebert / int_950bbfa7	comment	Take a Third Option: In a show with a single split decision and all other films receiving two thumbs down, it was hard to recommend any of the week's films, so Ebert said, "My recommendation? Go see The Crying Game"—or, on occasion, any film either/both recommended in a previous week.
Siskel & Ebert / int_950bbfa7	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_950bbfa7	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_950bbfa7
Siskel & Ebert / int_95496a1d	type	The Announcer
Siskel & Ebert / int_95496a1d	comment	The Announcer: The series had a Cold Open announcer for many years, but in 1996, Siskel and Ebert began introducing the shows themselves.
Siskel & Ebert / int_95496a1d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_95496a1d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_95496a1d
Siskel & Ebert / int_96e5792c	type	Moral Guardians
Siskel & Ebert / int_96e5792c	comment	Moral Guardians: Their review of Silent Night, Deadly Night consisted mostly of them wagging their fingers and clucking "Shame, shame" at all the names listed in the credits. There's also Siskel's infamous review of the original Friday the 13th (1980), in which he referred to the director as "one of the most despicable creatures to ever infest the movie business" and gave out the personal addresses of some of the people involved in the film's creation so equally infuriated viewers could send their hate mail directly to them.
Siskel & Ebert / int_96e5792c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_96e5792c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_96e5792c
Siskel & Ebert / int_9716b4f7	type	Finish Dialogue in Unison
Siskel & Ebert / int_9716b4f7	comment	Finish Dialogue in Unison: In their review of Over the Top (1987), Siskel and Ebert both said "the strap" at the same time. Twice!
Siskel & Ebert / int_9716b4f7	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_9716b4f7	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_9716b4f7
Siskel & Ebert / int_974a9fe0	type	On the Next
Siskel & Ebert / int_974a9fe0	comment	On the Next: Before the closing catchphrase, each episode featured Siskel or Ebert saying what they'd review on the next show.
Siskel & Ebert / int_974a9fe0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_974a9fe0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_974a9fe0
Siskel & Ebert / int_987ff653	type	Promotional Consideration
Siskel & Ebert / int_987ff653	comment	Promotional Consideration: The sponsors varied, but two companies that often appeared in the "Promotional Consideration" slide were Nestle's Raisinets, sponsor of the Video Pick of the Week segment, and Jelly Belly Jelly Beans.
Siskel & Ebert / int_987ff653	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_987ff653	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_987ff653
Siskel & Ebert / int_98a19d7f	type	Money, Dear Boy
Siskel & Ebert / int_98a19d7f	comment	Money, Dear Boy:invoked A common complaint from the two when discussing why certain actors took roles. Ebert stated that Connery's huge smile in Highlander II: The Quickening was perhaps because of the massive paycheck he received, especially since the film had a huge budget and looked like it had No Budget.
Siskel & Ebert / int_98a19d7f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_98a19d7f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_98a19d7f
Siskel & Ebert / int_9ae8eea9	type	Character Tics
Siskel & Ebert / int_9ae8eea9	comment	Character Tics: Famously, they awarded each movie they reviewed a Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down. Their thumbs were in fact trademarked to prevent other shows from copying them!
Siskel & Ebert / int_9ae8eea9	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_9ae8eea9	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_9ae8eea9
Siskel & Ebert / int_9dfb8296	type	This Is Gonna Suck
Siskel & Ebert / int_9dfb8296	comment	This Is Gonna Suck: In reviewing The Stepfather, Ebert described the premise of the movie with obvious contempt and then declared that studio heads must have said, "Sounds good keep talking". Siskel audibly and painfully groaned, "Oh, God."
Siskel & Ebert / int_9dfb8296	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_9dfb8296	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_9dfb8296
Siskel & Ebert / int_9e0c3153	type	Punctuated! For! Emphasis!
Siskel & Ebert / int_9e0c3153	comment	Punctuated! For! Emphasis!: In their "Worst of 1994" show, Ebert recalled what he wrote in his Chicago Sun-Times review of North (which they both considered the worst movie of that year):
Siskel & Ebert / int_9e0c3153	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_9e0c3153	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_9e0c3153
Siskel & Ebert / int_a16a9c3a	type	Love It or Hate It
Siskel & Ebert / int_a16a9c3a	comment	Love It or Hate It: Invoked nearly every time Siskel and Ebert disagreed on a film, giving it a split "Thumbs up/Thumbs down" rating, and inevitably leading to a heated argument.
Siskel & Ebert / int_a16a9c3a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_a16a9c3a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_a16a9c3a
Siskel & Ebert / int_a4c37cbe	type	Mood Whiplash
Siskel & Ebert / int_a4c37cbe	comment	Mood Whiplash: Due to the wide variety of films that debuted each week, they could review a slasher flick... followed immediately by a lighthearted family film. Lampshaded by Siskel in one episode: Another good one was when they reviewed Nicolas Cage's It Could Happen to You, which they were very enthusiastic about, calling it one of the best films of the year... After the commercial that followed this review came the North review, which doesn't need an explanation. An even more extreme example: In one 1985 episode, they reviewed Shoah, which they considered one of the greatest films of all time (Gene appropriately said it's the best usage of film)... and after the commercial break was Death Wish 3. 'Nuff said.
Siskel & Ebert / int_a4c37cbe	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_a4c37cbe	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_a4c37cbe
Siskel & Ebert / int_a68421bb	type	Animated Adaptation
Siskel & Ebert / int_a68421bb	comment	Animated Adaptation: The Critic episode "Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice".
Siskel & Ebert / int_a68421bb	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_a68421bb	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_a68421bb
Siskel & Ebert / int_a70f9aba	type	Accentuate the Negative
Siskel & Ebert / int_a70f9aba	comment	Accentuate the Negative: Averted. Siskel and Ebert love to give positive reviews, it's just that the films aren't always up to snuff. In fact, there have been a few episodes where they've given two thumbs up to every film. In the fall of 1996, they gave two thumbs up to every movie two weeks in a row, albeit Ebert describes that situation as unprecedented. To paraphrase Gene on one talk show, "I would rather watch Hannah and Her Sisters every day for the rest of my life than a bad movie ever again", essentially to counter the point that critics love to see movies for an opportunity to nitpick and criticize (as he had adored Allen's film). Ebert accused Siskel of giving praise to Jim Carrey grudgingly when they reviewed The Mask: Averted, not on the show, but on Ebert's corresponding series of "Video Home Companion" books chronicling his reviews. Since bad movies tend to be forgotten while good movies endure, movies with three to four stars tended to be retained from one volume to the next. Ebert himself acknowledged that this gave an illusion that he liked most of the movies that he reviewed. Since they both gave films star ratings in their newspaper reviews, according to Ebert, the agreed-upon threshold was that "thumbs up"=three stars or higher, but, also according to Ebert, there were a handful of cases where Siskel gave a thumbs-up to a two-a-half-star movie because he just couldn't stand to give it a bad notice on the show, despite its flaws.
Siskel & Ebert / int_a70f9aba	featureApplicability	-1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_a70f9aba	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_a70f9aba
Siskel & Ebert / int_a7aef9ff	type	Obfuscating Stupidity
Siskel & Ebert / int_a7aef9ff	comment	Obfuscating Stupidity: One of their stranger arguments was debating whether Ed was truly stupid (what Siskel believed) or faking it to be ironic (what Ebert believed) in Good Burger.
Siskel & Ebert / int_a7aef9ff	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_a7aef9ff	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_a7aef9ff
Siskel & Ebert / int_ab729e43	type	Disappointed in You
Siskel & Ebert / int_ab729e43	comment	Disappointed in You: Siskel gave a positive review to Baby's Day Out, and Ebert replied by saying he hated the movie more than anything they'd ever reviewed on the show and said he was disappointed in Siskel and should be ashamed of himself.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ab729e43	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ab729e43	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ab729e43
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae3d6438	type	Deadpan Snarker
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae3d6438	comment	Deadpan Snarker: Both Siskel and Ebert often fell into this. An example: Another example, from their review of Teen Wolf Too, when Ebert said it was a worse film than Date With an Angel because it didn't have someone like Emmanuelle BÃ©art in it: Michael Phillips was the deadpan critic whenever he was paired with the more energetic Richard Roeper. Ironically, Phillips was out-deadpanned whenever he worked with the New York Times' A.O. Scott.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae3d6438	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae3d6438	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ae3d6438
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae4b1ce1	type	Caustic Critic
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae4b1ce1	comment	Caustic Critic: Usually their reviews are fairly levelheaded, but occasionally a really bad film comes along that will cause one or both to rip it to shreds, such as North.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae4b1ce1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ae4b1ce1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ae4b1ce1
Siskel & Ebert / int_afd446fc	type	Complaining About Shows You Don't Watch
Siskel & Ebert / int_afd446fc	comment	Complaining About Shows You Don't Watch: Invoked whenever they report on groups protesting a controversial movie, such as The Last Temptation of Christ or Get on the Bus: They say the groups' criticisms are invalid if they haven't actually seen the movie in question (and in nearly all cases, they hadn't).
Siskel & Ebert / int_afd446fc	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_afd446fc	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_afd446fc
Siskel & Ebert / int_b01abe4f	type	Catchphrase
Siskel & Ebert / int_b01abe4f	comment	Catchphrase: Aside from the quote at the top, there's "Two [adjective] thumbs up, way up" or "Two thumbs down, way down", in both extreme cases. Each episode also opened with either Siskel or Ebert saying some variant of, "(movie title) is one of (four/five) new movies we'll be reviewing this week on Siskel & Ebert. I'm (Gene Siskel/Roger Ebert) of the (Chicago Tribune/Chicago Sun-Times)...", followed by the other saying their name and paper. The latter would then introduce the first film.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b01abe4f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b01abe4f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b01abe4f
Siskel & Ebert / int_b0218885	type	Mickey Mousing
Siskel & Ebert / int_b0218885	comment	Mickey Mousing: Criticized in their review of Hanna's War, claiming it distracted from the action rather than enhancing it.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b0218885	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b0218885	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b0218885
Siskel & Ebert / int_b109e518	type	Twisting the Words
Siskel & Ebert / int_b109e518	comment	Twisting the Words: Sometimes occurs, especially when they review movies about controversial subject matter.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b109e518	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b109e518	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b109e518
Siskel & Ebert / int_b11ac9f5	type	Abusive Parents
Siskel & Ebert / int_b11ac9f5	comment	Siskel hated two movie tropes in particular: Showing women or children in jeopardy, as he felt that was a cheap way to generate drama, and jerk fathers. In the latter's case, he got so annoyed by the trope that he thought they should do a special episode about the practice (they never did).
Siskel & Ebert / int_b11ac9f5	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b11ac9f5	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b11ac9f5
Siskel & Ebert / int_b18aeb20	type	Oddly Named Sequel 2: Electric Boogaloo
Siskel & Ebert / int_b18aeb20	comment	Oddly Named Sequel 2: Electric Boogaloo: Twice in their review of Highlander II: The Quickening, Ebert remarked, "...What a title."
Siskel & Ebert / int_b18aeb20	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b18aeb20	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b18aeb20
Siskel & Ebert / int_b219ac90	type	ReTool
Siskel & Ebert / int_b219ac90	comment	Retool: Infamously done during the Lyons/Mankiewicz era.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b219ac90	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b219ac90	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b219ac90
Siskel & Ebert / int_b24ce4b2	type	Rearrange the Song
Siskel & Ebert / int_b24ce4b2	comment	Rearrange the Song: The Ebert & Roeper theme music is a remixed version of the Siskel & Ebert theme.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b24ce4b2	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b24ce4b2	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b24ce4b2
Siskel & Ebert / int_b3a0852b	type	Animation Age Ghetto
Siskel & Ebert / int_b3a0852b	comment	Animation Age Ghetto: invoked Siskel and Ebert seemed to go back and forth on this, Ebert even debunking it during his review of Ratatouille. But then again they fell into the ghetto with their review of An American Tail where Ebert insisted that kids can't handle a movie filled with pathos. Also debated during their review of Mulan, where Siskel thought Ebert was arguing that because Mulan is a cartoon, we can't/shouldn't take it as seriously as live action.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b3a0852b	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b3a0852b	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b3a0852b
Siskel & Ebert / int_b4a6fef1	type	Tough Room
Siskel & Ebert / int_b4a6fef1	comment	Tough Room: In one review, Ebert made a joke and Siskel didn't laugh. Ebert thanked Siskel for his overwhelming support, and Siskel replied, "It wasn't that funny."
Siskel & Ebert / int_b4a6fef1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b4a6fef1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b4a6fef1
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5785433	type	ColdOpen
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5785433	comment	Cold Open: Every episode began with an announcer telling a few of the movies Siskel and Ebert would be reviewing. Starting in the Fall of 1996, Siskel and Ebert would announce the films themselves.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5785433	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5785433	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b5785433
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5db2732	type	Quality by Popular Vote
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5db2732	comment	Quality by Popular Vote: Invoked. The duo got annoyed at the weekly box office results for this reason. They felt it turned movies into a competitive sport, where the movies that didn't do as well were seen as inferior in quality to the box office "winners", even though that wasn't necessarily the case.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5db2732	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b5db2732	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b5db2732
Siskel & Ebert / int_b6cebad3	type	Double Standard
Siskel & Ebert / int_b6cebad3	comment	Double Standard: In their debate about Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood, Ebert asked Siskel (who was Jewish) if he'd feel the same way about this film if it starred Jewish people and had Jewish stereotypes. Siskel said that if it were funny, he'd like it just as much. Ebert then expressed doubt that anyone would make such a film. This was one of their complaints with the MPAA ratings system.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b6cebad3	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b6cebad3	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b6cebad3
Siskel & Ebert / int_b73a2a6f	type	Finger Wag
Siskel & Ebert / int_b73a2a6f	comment	Finger Wag: Films that were Not Screened for Critics got the Wagging Finger of Shame. This rating was short-lived, however; it only lasted a year before Ebert abandoned it, claiming that it wasn't really stopping studios from withholding their movies from critics.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b73a2a6f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b73a2a6f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b73a2a6f
Siskel & Ebert / int_b7f082b6	type	Logical Fallacies
Siskel & Ebert / int_b7f082b6	comment	Logical Fallacies: Ebert made one during their review of Gamera: Guardian of the Universe. He gave the film thumbs up despite listing some flaws. Siskel said that all of Ebert's flaws were accurate and suggested renting one of the early giant monster movies instead (which he felt were superior). At this point, Ebert took Siskel's point too far by sarcastically suggesting that the audience shouldn't bother with any of the films on the program and to just rent Citizen Kane. Ebert's fallacy backfired when Siskel said: "Well, you could do that, and I think you and I both look at Citizen Kane regularly. But I'm just saying is, that I think you want to like this picture more than you know in your heart of hearts that it really contains entertainment value." Siskel made one in the episode where Ebert gave Full Metal Jacket a marginal thumbs down. Siskel said it was absurd that Ebert was giving a Kubrick film that rating, while in the same show he gave a recommendation to Benji the Hunted (which he disliked). As Ebert rightfully pointed out, Jacket and Benji are two totally different genres and as such, deserve to have different criteria for judging themnote Long-time readers of Ebert's reviews and website would be aware that this was a major aspect of the way he reviewed films - when scoring a movie like Spider-Man 2 or The Dark Knight, he would compare it to Superman: The Movie (which he considered the greatest comic book/Superhero movie ever), not to something like The Godfather or Citizen Kane.
Siskel & Ebert / int_b7f082b6	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b7f082b6	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b7f082b6
Siskel & Ebert / int_b894042e	type	False Dichotomy
Siskel & Ebert / int_b894042e	comment	False Dichotomy: Ebert made one when he reviewed French Twist and was upset that France selected the film for the Academy Awards instead of Les MisÃ©rables (1995):
Siskel & Ebert / int_b894042e	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_b894042e	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_b894042e
Siskel & Ebert / int_bb660963	type	Color-Coded Characters
Siskel & Ebert / int_bb660963	comment	Color-Coded Characters: Referenced (and criticized) in their review of The Pebble and the Penguin. Ebert criticized the movie for color-coding its characters so that the villain had a dark complexion and the heroes had mostly white faces. He thought this sent a negative subliminal message to kids.
Siskel & Ebert / int_bb660963	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_bb660963	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_bb660963
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc00493f	type	Precision F-Strike
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc00493f	comment	Precision F-Strike: The duo generally avoided even the mildest curse words, but Gene let a "damn" slip out when he reviewed Speechless:
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc00493f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc00493f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_bc00493f
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc74ef27	type	Berserk Button
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc74ef27	comment	Berserk Button: In their review of the 1995 French comedy French Twist, Ebert was appalled that the French chose this film as their submission to the Academy Awards, when they could've nominated Les MisÃ©rables (1995) instead. He wanted to get the voting crew to look him in the eye to say that French Twist was a better film and was convinced they wouldn't be able to do it, since he thought the voting was fixed and corrupt. It wasn't the first time they were pissed at the French, as they were similarly outraged at the omission of Vagabond (1985) (instead nominating Betty Blue) and other films later. (In fact, it was because of Vagabond's snub that the duo had a "there they go again" attitude about French Twist.) In his review of Leonard Part 6, Ebert went on a rant about Product Placement: You would be well-advised not to insinuate that Siskel was wrong simply because he held a different opinion than the majority, as we saw in their review of Outbreak when Ebert said Siskel was probably the only one who thought Dustin Hoffman looked ridiculous in the lab coat. Siskel and Ebert were against colorization and cropping movies, and rallied against it whenever it was appropriate. Ebert ranted hard against Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter - yet knowing the franchise's success rate it didn't work to drive people away: Both Gene and Roger had it in for the Academy Awards Documentary committee and their opaque at best and corrupt at worst method of selecting the nominees for Best Documentary feature. It seemed just about every year there would be an exclusion that would piss Gene and Roger off, most notably Hoop Dreams in 1994, but also The Thin Blue Line in 1988 and Roger and Me in 1989. Hoop Dreams, however, was the final straw for Ebert: After he wrote a newspaper column about the film being snubbed, the Academy did its own investigation of the nomination process for the award and completely revamped how films were nominated from then onward. In a year-in-review special, Ebert reflected that North was so astoundingly bad that something just came over him and moved him to (infamously) use the word "hated" ten times in his print review. Siskel hated two movie tropes in particular: Showing women or children in jeopardy, as he felt that was a cheap way to generate drama, and jerk fathers. In the latter's case, he got so annoyed by the trope that he thought they should do a special episode about the practice (they never did). Outside of the movies themselves, Siskel was rumored to have had no tolerance whatsoever for parents who bring their babies to a theater and don't take them out when they started crying, and was willing to go so far as to pay them to leave if they didn't.
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc74ef27	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_bc74ef27	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_bc74ef27
Siskel & Ebert / int_bcc5c9a5	type	Replaced the Theme Tune
Siskel & Ebert / int_bcc5c9a5	comment	Replaced the Theme Tune: Each new version of the show has had a different instrumental theme song.
Siskel & Ebert / int_bcc5c9a5	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_bcc5c9a5	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_bcc5c9a5
Siskel & Ebert / int_be987a84	type	Review Ironic Echo
Siskel & Ebert / int_be987a84	comment	Review Ironic Echo: These would occasionally pop up between Roger and Gene. For the 1990 film Stella, immediately after Roger praises the film, Gene provides a rather biting rebuttal against it.
Siskel & Ebert / int_be987a84	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_be987a84	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_be987a84
Siskel & Ebert / int_c067b082	type	Black Bead Eyes
Siskel & Ebert / int_c067b082	comment	Black Bead Eyes: The duo derided the main character in Jack Frost (1998) for having two lumps of coal for eyes, claiming that it made the character look creepy and hard to sympathize with.
Siskel & Ebert / int_c067b082	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c067b082	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c067b082
Siskel & Ebert / int_c104b27e	type	What Do You Mean, It's for Kids?
Siskel & Ebert / int_c104b27e	comment	What Do You Mean, It's for Kids?: Occurred a few times when they reviewed movies that fell into this category, like Kindergarten Cop and Cool World.
Siskel & Ebert / int_c104b27e	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c104b27e	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c104b27e
Siskel & Ebert / int_c325f125	type	Ho Yay
Siskel & Ebert / int_c325f125	comment	Ho Yay: Invoked. And played with. During their review of Female Perversions:
Siskel & Ebert / int_c325f125	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c325f125	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c325f125
Siskel & Ebert / int_c335b9ec	type	Irony
Siskel & Ebert / int_c335b9ec	comment	Irony: In one of their most famous episodes, Ebert gave a marginal thumbs down to Full Metal Jacket, claiming it wasn't Kubrick's best. Siskel used the logic that it was way better than most of the movies released that year and deserved a thumbs up. Eight years later, the roles were reversed when they reviewed Casino: Siskel gave it a marginal thumbs down because he compared it unfavorably to Scorsese's earlier work (especially Goodfellas) and Ebert claimed it was better than the majority of the movies that year and was worth seeing.
Siskel & Ebert / int_c335b9ec	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c335b9ec	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c335b9ec
Siskel & Ebert / int_c39a5ef0	type	Willing Suspension of Disbelief
Siskel & Ebert / int_c39a5ef0	comment	Willing Suspension of Disbelief: Ebert accuses Roeper of not utilizing this enough when watching Lara Croft: Tomb Raider.
Siskel & Ebert / int_c39a5ef0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c39a5ef0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c39a5ef0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c75df49a	type	Shout-Out
Siskel & Ebert / int_c75df49a	comment	Shout-Out: In their review of Black Sheep, Siskel gave a nod to the famous "Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy" quote:
Siskel & Ebert / int_c75df49a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_c75df49a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_c75df49a
Siskel & Ebert / int_cbe3d017	type	Damned by Faint Praise
Siskel & Ebert / int_cbe3d017	comment	Damned by Faint Praise: Occasionally occurs if a movie is really awful. In their brief review of The Hot Chick, Roeper listed the positives of the movie: It was in color, and was mostly in focus. He could say only one positive thing on the show's review of Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever three months earlier: "No Mounties were harmed in the making of this movie." While they both agreed that Free Willy 3 was the best of the Free Willy trilogy, Gene Siskel admitted that he did not care for the other two installments in the first place. While they gave it two thumbs down, Gene admitted D2: The Mighty Ducks was the best movie they reviewed on the episode... "which isn't saying a lot".Note(the other movies reviewed on that episode were Jimmy Hollywood, Thumbelina1994, The House of the Spirits, and Major League 2)
Siskel & Ebert / int_cbe3d017	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_cbe3d017	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_cbe3d017
Siskel & Ebert / int_cdd835ce	type	Dude, Not Funny!
Siskel & Ebert / int_cdd835ce	comment	Dude, Not Funny!: Ebert accused Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood of making fun of serious subjects which he felt shouldn't be mocked. Siskel tried to call him out on it, suggesting that any topic can be parodied if done right.
Siskel & Ebert / int_cdd835ce	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_cdd835ce	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_cdd835ce
Siskel & Ebert / int_ce104b8e	type	Serial Escalation
Siskel & Ebert / int_ce104b8e	comment	Serial Escalation: The "If We Picked the Winners" Oscar special began as a simple Formula-Breaking Episode with Gene and Roger in the balcony wearing tuxedos, but eventually turned into a huge spectacle done on a stage at the Disney complex in Florida with a studio audience and an orchestra.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ce104b8e	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ce104b8e	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ce104b8e
Siskel & Ebert / int_d028ca10	type	Deliberately Monochrome
Siskel & Ebert / int_d028ca10	comment	Deliberately Monochrome: When they did an episode on black and white movies, the footage was also given a black and white filter, with Ebert telling the viewers not to adjust their sets.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d028ca10	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d028ca10	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d028ca10
Siskel & Ebert / int_d0f0a80d	type	One-Word Title
Siskel & Ebert / int_d0f0a80d	comment	One-Word Title: This was pretty much Siskel and Ebert's only criticism of Bound: The title was vague and didn't really give a clue as to what the movie was about. They theorized that's why it didn't do especially well at the box office.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d0f0a80d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d0f0a80d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d0f0a80d
Siskel & Ebert / int_d1affec1	type	That Came Out Wrong
Siskel & Ebert / int_d1affec1	comment	That Came Out Wrong: When the duo reviewed The Living Daylights, Siskel called Timothy Dalton's portrayal of Bond "mousy", which baffled Ebert. When they reviewed White Squall, one of Siskel's criticisms was that the movie had too many characters who were only defined by their struggles and not being more developed than that, and that they hit the usual archetypes. Fine, except he described it as a "shooting gallery of kids". Er... not the best combination of words.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d1affec1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d1affec1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d1affec1
Siskel & Ebert / int_d4c98786	type	Writing Around Trademarks
Siskel & Ebert / int_d4c98786	comment	Writing Around Trademarks: The annual Oscar show was originally called "If We Picked the Oscars", but since "Oscars" is trademarked, they had to change it to "If We Picked the Winners".
Siskel & Ebert / int_d4c98786	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d4c98786	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d4c98786
Siskel & Ebert / int_d5dfb30a	type	Professional Butt-Kisser
Siskel & Ebert / int_d5dfb30a	comment	Professional Butt-Kisser: A few of Ebert's guest hosts could be seen as this.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d5dfb30a	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d5dfb30a	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d5dfb30a
Siskel & Ebert / int_d68c925d	type	Creator Provincialism
Siskel & Ebert / int_d68c925d	comment	Creator Provincialism: Setting a movie in or around Chicago was guaranteed to draw their interest, although this could be positive or negative.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d68c925d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d68c925d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d68c925d
Siskel & Ebert / int_d7fc9fd0	type	Vitriolic Best Buds
Siskel & Ebert / int_d7fc9fd0	comment	Vitriolic Best Buds: Just watch this clip. Also to be expected when one watches any of their guest appearances on talk shows, ESPECIALLY with David Letterman.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d7fc9fd0	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d7fc9fd0	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d7fc9fd0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d9cf40fa	type	Screw This, I'm Outta Here
Siskel & Ebert / int_d9cf40fa	comment	Screw This, I'm Outta Here: Siskel walked out of Black Sheep (1996). Roeper walked out of The Brothers Solomon.
Siskel & Ebert / int_d9cf40fa	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_d9cf40fa	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_d9cf40fa
Siskel & Ebert / int_da41243d	type	Spoiler
Siskel & Ebert / int_da41243d	comment	Spoiler: Unfortunately, some of Siskel and Ebert's reviews contained spoilers.
Siskel & Ebert / int_da41243d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_da41243d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_da41243d
Siskel & Ebert / int_e18a3c59	type	Hilarious Outtakes
Siskel & Ebert / int_e18a3c59	comment	Hilarious Outtakes: Gene doesn't like them. He claims that even when they're funny, it's a sign of desperation on the part of the filmmakers: "We're not sure if we made a funny picture, but now we're gonna throw this stuff in, and we'll leave you laughing on the way out." And he said it makes the movie feel like one of those blooper TV specials.
Siskel & Ebert / int_e18a3c59	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e18a3c59	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e18a3c59
Siskel & Ebert / int_e38d605	type	Big Guy, Little Guy
Siskel & Ebert / int_e38d605	comment	Big Guy, Little Guy: They both fit either role, depending on how you looked at it. Hefty Ebert contrasted with skinny Siskel, but Siskel was the taller of the two (by about 6 inches/15cm).
Siskel & Ebert / int_e38d605	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e38d605	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e38d605
Siskel & Ebert / int_e53231b2	type	Idiosyncratic Ratings Scale
Siskel & Ebert / int_e53231b2	comment	Idiosyncratic Ratings Scale: The Trope Maker. Siskel and Ebert's simple thumbs up/down way of rating films, combined with their lively discussions/arguments supporting their decisions, made the show almost a cultural touchstone for movie reviewing prior to Rotten Tomatoes.
Siskel & Ebert / int_e53231b2	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e53231b2	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e53231b2
Siskel & Ebert / int_e54482ee	type	Keet
Siskel & Ebert / int_e54482ee	comment	Michael Phillips was the deadpan critic whenever he was paired with the more energetic Richard Roeper. Ironically, Phillips was out-deadpanned whenever he worked with the New York Times' A.O. Scott.
Siskel & Ebert / int_e54482ee	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e54482ee	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e54482ee
Siskel & Ebert / int_e563bf09	type	Insistent Terminology
Siskel & Ebert / int_e563bf09	comment	Insistent Terminology: Siskel and Ebert will generally refer to characters in the films they review by the names of the actors portraying them.
Siskel & Ebert / int_e563bf09	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e563bf09	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e563bf09
Siskel & Ebert / int_e9e35e8f	type	Exact Words
Siskel & Ebert / int_e9e35e8f	comment	Exact Words: During their review of The Mask, Siskel said he liked the movie, leading to: Played for Laughs in Ebert and Roeper's review of Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties. Richard said he didn't hate it as much as the first film; Roger (who gave thumbs up to the first film) ran with this remark:
Siskel & Ebert / int_e9e35e8f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_e9e35e8f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_e9e35e8f
Siskel & Ebert / int_ea85d6ea	type	All Just a Dream
Siskel & Ebert / int_ea85d6ea	comment	All Just a Dream: Gene is not a fan, criticizing its use in Jaws: The Revenge as a cheap trick that's a Dead Horse Trope. He's not alone, either; he noted how the audience with him that night groaned when it happened.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ea85d6ea	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ea85d6ea	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ea85d6ea
Siskel & Ebert / int_ef2fcbe1	type	Le Film Artistique
Siskel & Ebert / int_ef2fcbe1	comment	Le Film Artistique: One completely incorrect statement about the duo is that they supposedly give thumbs up only to pretentious artsy foreign films and give thumbs down to all mainstream action films. Yeah, they really hated Die Hard 2, Executive Decision, The Fugitive, Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Speed, Mission: Impossible, Under Siege 2: Dark Territory, and Men in Black, among many others. Not only this, but they frequently called out the Oscars at times where they felt Harrison Ford was ignored for Academy attention for his action roles, which they mentioned more than once that he could do better than anyone else (aside from maybe Steve McQueen in decades past). The Fugitive was probably one of the more notable examples of them feeling he was snubbed. Siskel addressed this stereotype in their review of Blade: "I think sometimes we get a rap that we don't like special effects pictures. And I'm saying Blade qualifies as a good one."
Siskel & Ebert / int_ef2fcbe1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ef2fcbe1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ef2fcbe1
Siskel & Ebert / int_f068cba	type	Oddball in the Series
Siskel & Ebert / int_f068cba	comment	Oddball in the Series: The 1996 season introduced a couple new segments: The Viewer's Thumb (video criticisms from viewers), which was quickly dropped, and The Revolving Thumb (the duo giving thumbs up or down to a trend in the movies), which lasted a little longer but was mostly gone from the series by 1997.
Siskel & Ebert / int_f068cba	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_f068cba	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_f068cba
Siskel & Ebert / int_f10d3363	type	Distracted by the Sexy
Siskel & Ebert / int_f10d3363	comment	Distracted by the Sexy: Ebert seemed more vulnerable to this, sometimes giving mediocre movies a pass if they had a particularly attractive woman in it (Roeper often chided Roger for his infatuation with Angelina Jolie), but Siskel wasn't above it, either... one of his major criticisms of Showgirls was that Elizabeth Berkley didn't look sexy enough. Both Siskel and Ebert both found themselves experiencing sexual stimulation when watching 1974's Emmanuelle, a film they both actually praised.
Siskel & Ebert / int_f10d3363	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_f10d3363	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_f10d3363
Siskel & Ebert / int_f31289ec	type	Hire the Critic
Siskel & Ebert / int_f31289ec	comment	Hire the Critic: Invoked. On more than one occasion, Siskel and Ebert have said that if they were hired by Hollywood, they could fix a lot of bad screenplays.
Siskel & Ebert / int_f31289ec	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_f31289ec	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_f31289ec
Siskel & Ebert / int_f5e6ed44	type	No Sense of Humor
Siskel & Ebert / int_f5e6ed44	comment	No Sense of Humor: Siskel accused Ebert of this when Ebert gave a scathing review to Kids in the Hall: Brain Candy. Siskel also asked Ebert where his sense of humor was when Ebert gave a thumbs down to Eddie Murphy: Raw.
Siskel & Ebert / int_f5e6ed44	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_f5e6ed44	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_f5e6ed44
Siskel & Ebert / int_f6f2ff1	type	Insult Backfire
Siskel & Ebert / int_f6f2ff1	comment	Insult Backfire: During their review of 3 Ninjas Kick Back: Similarly, when they reviewed Benji the Hunted: They both were parodied in Godzilla (1998), with the characters Mayor Ebert and his sidekick Gene. They were not amused because the filmmakers didn't have the audacity to have the two squished by Godzilla.
Siskel & Ebert / int_f6f2ff1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_f6f2ff1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_f6f2ff1
Siskel & Ebert / int_fabef10f	type	Don't Explain the Joke
Siskel & Ebert / int_fabef10f	comment	Don't Explain the Joke: When reviewing The Rugrats Movie, Gene said that the Pickles have a baby named Dil.
Siskel & Ebert / int_fabef10f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_fabef10f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_fabef10f
Siskel & Ebert / int_fbd5fda1	type	Friendly Rivalry
Siskel & Ebert / int_fbd5fda1	comment	Friendly Rivalry: Siskel and Ebert made no efforts to hide this, naturally, because they worked for different newspapers in the same city. Though Michael Phillips and Richard Roeper also worked for the rival Chicago papers (Siskel's Tribune and Ebert's Sun Times, respectively), they were generally more amicable to each other than Gene and Roger.
Siskel & Ebert / int_fbd5fda1	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_fbd5fda1	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_fbd5fda1
Siskel & Ebert / int_fc151e9d	type	Department of Redundancy Department
Siskel & Ebert / int_fc151e9d	comment	Department of Redundancy Department: Frequently, after finishing a review and moving onto the next one, Siskel or Ebert would say: "Next movie, and our next movie is ______." In Ebert and Roeper's review of She Hate Me, Ebert describes the film as tackling "office politics, sexual politics, and politics politics."
Siskel & Ebert / int_fc151e9d	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_fc151e9d	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_fc151e9d
Siskel & Ebert / int_fd189d07	type	Briefer Than They Think
Siskel & Ebert / int_fd189d07	comment	Briefer Than They Think: Even thought it was the show that made them big names, the Siskel & Ebert-hosted era of Sneak Previews as a nationally-aired PBS show only lasted four years (1978-82) before they moved to syndication. By contrast, the Jeffrey Lyons-Michael Medved era (1985-1996) was almost three times as long (with Lyons starting in 1982).
Siskel & Ebert / int_fd189d07	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_fd189d07	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_fd189d07
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff3f8c7c	type	Pretentious Pronunciation
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff3f8c7c	comment	Pretentious Pronunciation: Played for laughs: Roeper pronounced Fockers as "Fauquers".
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff3f8c7c	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff3f8c7c	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ff3f8c7c
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff9e9dde	type	Once a Season
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff9e9dde	comment	Once a Season: "Memo to the Academy", "Oscar Surprises", "Best of", "Worst of", "If We Picked the Winners".
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff9e9dde	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ff9e9dde	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ff9e9dde
Siskel & Ebert / int_ffad4e9f	type	Shown Their Work
Siskel & Ebert / int_ffad4e9f	comment	Shown Their Work: Siskel and Ebert rarely made mistakes during their reviews, and often mentioned screenwriters, cinematographers, and directors by name.
Siskel & Ebert / int_ffad4e9f	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_ffad4e9f	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_ffad4e9f
Siskel & Ebert / int_name	type	ItemName
Siskel & Ebert / int_name	comment
Siskel & Ebert / int_name	featureApplicability	1.0
Siskel & Ebert / int_name	featureConfidence	1.0
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Siskel & Ebert / int_name
Siskel & Ebert / int_name	itemName	Siskel & Ebert

The following is a list of statements referring to the current page from other pages.

Life Itself	seeAlso	Siskel & Ebert
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Deliberately Monochrome / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Idiosyncratic Ratings Scale / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Instrumental Theme Tune / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Literal Metaphor / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Memetic Hand Gesture / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Name and Name / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Offending the Creator's Own / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Periphery Hatedom / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Porn Stache / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Saw "Star Wars" Twenty-Seven Times / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Signing-Off Catchphrase / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Take That, Critics! / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Walking Out on the Show / int_49b5a86f
Siskel & Ebert	hasFeature	Spinning Paper / int_49b5a86f

Copyright of DBTropes.org wrapper 2009-2013 DFKI Knowledge Management. Imprint. - Thanks to Bakken&Baeck for hosting. Contact.
Copyright of data TVTropes.org contributors under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Siskel &amp; Ebert

Siskel & Ebert