Search/Recent Changes
DBTropes
...it's like TV Tropes, but LINKED DATA!

In Justice (2006)

 In Justice (2006)
type
TVTItem
 In Justice (2006)
label
In Justice (2006)
 In Justice (2006)
page
InJustice2006
 In Justice (2006)
comment
In Justice is a short lived TV show that aired in 2006. It centers around the National Justice Project, headed by ambitious attorney David Swain and former police detective Charles Conti. The NJP basically investigates people who are in prison who claim they're innocent of the crimes they were sent in for, and if they are, tries to get them out of prison.Notable for starring Jason O'Mara, Kyle MacLachlan, Constance Zimmer and Marisol Nichols.Unrelated to the DC Fighting Game franchise of the same name.
 In Justice (2006)
fetched
2023-07-19T16:30:59Z
 In Justice (2006)
parsed
2023-07-19T16:30:59Z
 In Justice (2006)
isPartOf
DBTropes
 In Justice (2006) / int_231e8193
type
Mistaken Identity
 In Justice (2006) / int_231e8193
comment
Mistaken Identity: The pilot shows the prisoner was convicted as a result of being mistaken for her half-sister in the dark, who she did not even know about. Both closely resembled the other, with the half-sister killing their father.
 In Justice (2006) / int_231e8193
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_231e8193
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_231e8193
 In Justice (2006) / int_2d363f63
type
Frame-Up
 In Justice (2006) / int_2d363f63
comment
Frame-Up: Several cases, though in some the actual perpetrator is not involved-it's just authorities wanting to insure the conviction of suspects they believe are really guilty. So to them it's a case of Framing the Guilty Party.
 In Justice (2006) / int_2d363f63
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_2d363f63
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_2d363f63
 In Justice (2006) / int_4781adbb
type
Jerk with a Heart of Gold
 In Justice (2006) / int_4781adbb
comment
Jerk with a Heart of Gold: Swain is kind of an asshole, but it is made very clear that he does ultimately want to help innocent people as well.
 In Justice (2006) / int_4781adbb
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_4781adbb
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_4781adbb
 In Justice (2006) / int_4ef92d0b
type
The Atoner
 In Justice (2006) / int_4ef92d0b
comment
The Atoner: Conti is still haunted by the fact that he inadvertently drove an innocent man to kill himself.
 In Justice (2006) / int_4ef92d0b
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_4ef92d0b
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_4ef92d0b
 In Justice (2006) / int_59907e4f
type
Police Are Useless
 In Justice (2006) / int_59907e4f
comment
Police Are Useless: Played with. The show has no qualms about showing corruption or incompetence, but they also manage to be surprisingly nuanced. For instance, in episode 4 the client was falsely convicted because the police had lied to get him to confess. Ultimately, the team uses the exact same lie in order to trick the real killer into confessing, and at the end Conti grudgingly concedes that it isn't really different from what the cops did. The cops in episode 3 are also revealed to have missed evidence for an entirely understandable reason (the perp was a minor at the time and his fingerprints wouldn't have shown up in the database, and the police tape actually was pretty incriminating.)
 In Justice (2006) / int_59907e4f
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_59907e4f
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_59907e4f
 In Justice (2006) / int_653bb6cf
type
Last-Minute Reprieve
 In Justice (2006) / int_653bb6cf
comment
Last-Minute Reprieve: Subverted in "The Public Burning". At the end of the episode Swain meets with the Justice and lays out the new evidence namely that a.) a member of the church board had been beating his wife, b.) that the victim had known about it and tried to stop it, and c.) that not only had the suspect's wife retracted the alibi she gave him, they can prove that she was at the shelter on the night of the murder. The Justice responds that they can't put him at the scene, and that a suspicion isn't enough. What's more, the case has dragged on for 8 years, has seen two emergency petitions and many appeals.
 In Justice (2006) / int_653bb6cf
featureApplicability
-0.3
 In Justice (2006) / int_653bb6cf
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_653bb6cf
 In Justice (2006) / int_6b05b601
type
Jerkass Has a Point
 In Justice (2006) / int_6b05b601
comment
Jerkass Has a Point: Even though he's extremely callous about it, the Justice in "The Public Burning" is technically correct when he points out that a.) they can't put the new suspect at the scene of the crime, b.) they can't eliminate their client, and c.) the case has dragged on for 8 years and the sentence does need to be carried out. In the episode involving the teenager who confessed, the prosecutor points out that Conti used many of the same tactics and why it isn't okay now that he's a member of the National Justice Project. Conti counters by pointing out the one time those techniques didn't work (or they did, but the guy was innocent)....and resulted in an innocent man losing his life.
 In Justice (2006) / int_6b05b601
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_6b05b601
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_6b05b601
 In Justice (2006) / int_6ee10e0
type
My Greatest Failure
 In Justice (2006) / int_6ee10e0
comment
My Greatest Failure: For Conti, this is Andrew Connolly. Connolly had been accused of rape and murder; Conti lied in order to get him to confess. Ultimately, DNA proved him innocent.....years after he had hung himself in prison.
 In Justice (2006) / int_6ee10e0
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_6ee10e0
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_6ee10e0
 In Justice (2006) / int_8ae880f7
type
Deconstruction
 In Justice (2006) / int_8ae880f7
comment
Deconstruction: The show is NOT afraid to demonstrate police incompetence or the corruption of higher officials. The first episode alone has a prominent member of the FBI being arrested for framing an innocent man, another has a prosecutor coaching witnesses to get a desired verdict, and several other episodes feature incompetent experts and or witnesses who either failed to remember properly or outright lied. "The Public Burning" also demonstrates that the typical ending where the innocent man is saved doesn't usually happen.
 In Justice (2006) / int_8ae880f7
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_8ae880f7
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_8ae880f7
 In Justice (2006) / int_a1b0c1c2
type
Revealing Cover-Up
 In Justice (2006) / int_a1b0c1c2
comment
Revealing Cover-Up: Sort of. Calvin Axelrod's threat to Swain to drop the case or he'll bring the FBI down on one of Swain's clients is what ultimately makes Swain consider that Dan Wainwright may in fact be innocent.
 In Justice (2006) / int_a1b0c1c2
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_a1b0c1c2
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_a1b0c1c2
 In Justice (2006) / int_a70223
type
Karma Houdini
 In Justice (2006) / int_a70223
comment
Karma Houdini: MAYBE Eli Stillwell in "The Public Burning". We don't see anything happen on screen, but the last we see Conti in the episode he's confronting Stillwell in his house and the team can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he deliberately lied to the police about the alibi, meaning that they could well have nailed him offscreen.
 In Justice (2006) / int_a70223
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_a70223
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_a70223
 In Justice (2006) / int_acf33d00
type
Nice Job Fixing It, Villain
 In Justice (2006) / int_acf33d00
comment
Nice Job Fixing It, Villain: Initially Swain doesn't want to take the case in the pilot. After one of the villains threatens him Swain decides to take it, partially because he hates the guy, and also because the nature of the threat (a high-ranking FBI member personally telling lawyers not to get involved or he'll arrange for Swain's clients to be investigated) implies that something is up.
 In Justice (2006) / int_acf33d00
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_acf33d00
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_acf33d00
 In Justice (2006) / int_b4a6ae4c
type
Everyone Has Standards
 In Justice (2006) / int_b4a6ae4c
comment
Everyone Has Standards: The judge in the fourth episode is kind of a jerk who only cares about finality (he only reverses his verdict after Swain gets himself placed in prison, causing a public outcry that forces the judge to reverse his decision and allow DNA testing). However, after the DA tries to continue pressing Conti even after he's clearly miserable for reciting a rather painful story, he tells the DA to back off.
 In Justice (2006) / int_b4a6ae4c
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_b4a6ae4c
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_b4a6ae4c
 In Justice (2006) / int_db015585
type
False Confession
 In Justice (2006) / int_db015585
comment
False Confession: In his backstory, Conti got a suspect to confess that he'd committed rape and murder. The man hanged himself in prison... and then it turned out he was innocent when a man arrested for a different crime was not only a match for DNA but also confessed. Conti has been haunted by the case ever since, and this inspired him to join the National Justice Project working for innocent prisoners so they can be exonerated.
 In Justice (2006) / int_db015585
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_db015585
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_db015585
 In Justice (2006) / int_ddeaea82
type
Miscarriage of Justice
 In Justice (2006) / int_ddeaea82
comment
Miscarriage of Justice: The premise of the show; especially apparent in "The Public Burning" when Frank Benner (a disabled man) is executed for killing a priest. The team finds compelling proof that the church president was the true killer, but the Chief Justice refuses to grant a stay.
 In Justice (2006) / int_ddeaea82
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_ddeaea82
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_ddeaea82
 In Justice (2006) / int_de5e9f69
type
Bluffing the Murderer
 In Justice (2006) / int_de5e9f69
comment
Bluffing the Murderer: Conti takes down the murderer in episode 4 by claiming that the judge allowed them to test the DNA on the murder weapon, and that the DNA matched the killer. The murderer falls for it and confesses, allowing them to test it for real.
 In Justice (2006) / int_de5e9f69
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_de5e9f69
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_de5e9f69
 In Justice (2006) / int_ead0869d
type
Acquitted Too Late
 In Justice (2006) / int_ead0869d
comment
Acquitted Too Late: In "The Public Burning" (since they may have gotten the killer despite failing to save the client) but also in Conti's background (he pressured an innocent man to confess). Later he turned out to be innocent, but had already killed himself. Conti admits that this is what drove him to join the National Justice Project.
 In Justice (2006) / int_ead0869d
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_ead0869d
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_ead0869d
 In Justice (2006) / int_eb251937
type
Dirty Cop
 In Justice (2006) / int_eb251937
comment
Dirty Cop: One case involves a former cop convicted of killing a fellow officer who'd accused him of corruption. It's revealed not only was he innocent of that, but wasn't even corrupt to begin with. He had testified against dirty prison guards while incarcerated too. Other episodes however play this straight, with cops willing to frame people who they believe are guilty, or simply so their valuable informant (who had committed murder) is protected.
 In Justice (2006) / int_eb251937
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_eb251937
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_eb251937
 In Justice (2006) / int_f6d623ca
type
Eco-Terrorist
 In Justice (2006) / int_f6d623ca
comment
Eco-Terrorist: A couple in one case were convicted of murder and terrorism for a bombing which killed a waiter aimed at gas-guzzling cars. It turns out that another member of their group actually did this however, not them.
 In Justice (2006) / int_f6d623ca
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_f6d623ca
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_f6d623ca
 In Justice (2006) / int_f98356f
type
Right-Wing Militia Fanatic
 In Justice (2006) / int_f98356f
comment
Right-Wing Militia Fanatic: In one episode it turns out that an informant from a far-right militia is the perpetrator. He killed someone during a bank robbery, and his FBI handlers actually helped to frame someone so they could keep him as a source.
 In Justice (2006) / int_f98356f
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_f98356f
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_f98356f
 In Justice (2006) / int_name
type
ItemName
 In Justice (2006) / int_name
comment
 In Justice (2006) / int_name
featureApplicability
1.0
 In Justice (2006) / int_name
featureConfidence
1.0
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
In Justice (2006) / int_name
 In Justice (2006) / int_name
itemName
In Justice (2006)

The following is a list of statements referring to the current page from other pages.

 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
Acquitted Too Late / int_b2dfcf37
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
Eco-Terrorist / int_b2dfcf37
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
False Confession / int_b2dfcf37
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
Mistaken Identity / int_b2dfcf37
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
Right-Wing Militia Fanatic / int_b2dfcf37
 In Justice (2006)
hasFeature
Series of the 2000s / int_b2dfcf37