...it's like TV Tropes, but LINKED DATA!
12 Angry Men
- 581 statements
- 114 feature instances
- 58 referencing feature instances
12 Angry Men | type |
TVTItem | |
12 Angry Men | label |
12 Angry Men | |
12 Angry Men | page |
TwelveAngryMen | |
12 Angry Men | comment |
12 Angry Men is a 1957 drama film directed by Sidney Lumet, adapted by screenwriter Reginald Rose from his own teleplay of the same name. It stars Henry Fonda and a veritable All-Star Cast of character actors as the eponymous jury.The plot concerns a seemingly straightforward murder trial. An eyewitness, forensic evidence, and the accused himself all seem to clearly point toward an adolescent boy from the slums having murdered his father with a switchblade knife. In the deliberation room, most of the jury pushes for a quick "guilty" verdict — but a single juror, known only as Juror #8, holds out and insists that they reexamine the evidence thoroughly to make damn sure the accused actually deserves his punishment: a mandatory death sentence.This work is best known for popularizing the Rogue Juror trope, and most of the other works on the Rogue Juror page will reference it, either directly or indirectly. There is even a redirect to the trope in reference to this film: One Angry Juror.Rose's original teleplay, which aired on CBS in 1954 as an episode of the live dramatic anthology series Westinghouse Studio One, starred Robert Cummings as Juror #8. The broadcast earned Emmy Awards for Rose, Cummings, and director Franklin Schaffner.Adaptations 12 Angry Men (1997): Made-for-TV movie on Showtime, directed by William Friedkin and starring Jack Lemmon as Juror #8 and George C. Scott as the main antagonist, Juror #3. This adaptation race lifted several jurors, gender flipped the judge, and added more cussing. Twelve: 2007 Russian version | |
12 Angry Men | fetched |
2024-05-11T01:46:43Z | |
12 Angry Men | parsed |
2024-05-11T01:46:44Z | |
12 Angry Men | processingComment |
Dropped link to AnAesop: Not a Feature - IGNORE | |
12 Angry Men | processingComment |
Dropped link to Inverted: Not a Feature - UNKNOWN | |
12 Angry Men | processingUnknown |
Inverted | |
12 Angry Men | isPartOf |
DBTropes | |
12 Angry Men / int_1257a2d1 | type |
15 Minutes of Fame | |
12 Angry Men / int_1257a2d1 | comment |
Juror #9 also suggests that this trope could explain why the old man testified that he saw the defendant fleeing the murder scene, when his ability to have done so was severely in doubt. He was so eager for the chance to be part of a murder investigation and trial that it overrode his good sense. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1257a2d1 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1257a2d1 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1257a2d1 | |
12 Angry Men / int_146f4e0 | type |
Blind Without 'Em | |
12 Angry Men / int_146f4e0 | comment |
Blind Without 'Em: An important plot point: Juror #9 recalls that a key witness in the murder case had marks on her nose suggesting that she usually wears glasses, though opted not to in court. #8 points out that she was unlikely to be wearing them in bed late at night when she claims to have seen the murder from all the way across the street, thereby making her less than credible as a witness. | |
12 Angry Men / int_146f4e0 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_146f4e0 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_146f4e0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_17501df2 | type |
Cool Old Guy | |
12 Angry Men / int_17501df2 | comment |
Cool Old Guy: Juror #9, the oldest member of the cast and the first to support #8. He is also an excellent observer, even better than juror #8 himself, and the key to winning over some of the staunchest supporters of a guilty verdict. | |
12 Angry Men / int_17501df2 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_17501df2 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_17501df2 | |
12 Angry Men / int_191a3673 | type |
Graceful Loser | |
12 Angry Men / int_191a3673 | comment |
Graceful Loser: When his argument is refuted, Juror #4 simply says "I'm convinced. Not guilty." | |
12 Angry Men / int_191a3673 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_191a3673 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_191a3673 | |
12 Angry Men / int_19660a62 | type |
Non-Specifically Foreign | |
12 Angry Men / int_19660a62 | comment |
Non-Specifically Foreign: Several characters are noted for their ethnicity or nationality, but what ethnicity or nationality they are is never stated. Most notably, the defendant is either of some sort of ethnic minority or lower social class and lives in a slum, which has several of the jurors, particularly #10, predisposed into mistrusting him. Juror #5 is noted several times to have a similar economic background to the defendant and is implied to be an ethnic minority as well, while #11 is from an unspecified European country and is proud to be taking part in an American democratic process. The vagueness allows stagings of the play to get creative, the examples from both films being: The film's interpretation has the defendant appearing to be Italian or possibly Latino; #5 is played by Jack Klugman, who is Jewish; and #11 is played by George Voskovec, who is Czech (born in what was then part of the Austro-Hungarian empire). In the 1997 version, the defendant is explicitly Latino, #5 is Black (as are #1, #2, and interestingly enough, #10, whose racism stems from being a card-carrying member of the Nation of Islam movement), and #11 is Latino instead of European — and not the only immigrant this time, as #4 is German. | |
12 Angry Men / int_19660a62 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_19660a62 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_19660a62 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1994ba0b | type |
Gone Horribly Right | |
12 Angry Men / int_1994ba0b | comment |
Gone Horribly Right: Juror #3 set out to toughen his son up after seeing him run away from a fight. He succeeded; his son got into a fight with him, punched him out, left, and they haven't spoken to one another for years. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1994ba0b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1994ba0b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1994ba0b | |
12 Angry Men / int_1ba17583 | type |
The Ghost | |
12 Angry Men / int_1ba17583 | comment |
The Ghost: The witnesses mentioned are never shown, only described by the jurors—specifically Juror #9, who does so to make observations and hypotheses about them. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1ba17583 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1ba17583 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1ba17583 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c4e308e | type |
The Spock | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c4e308e | comment |
The Spock: Juror #4 is certainly the most rational of the group, concerning himself purely with the facts. Despite being one of the last holdouts in favor of conviction, he listens to all of his opponents' arguments with an open mind. Once all of his objections have been rebutted, he changes his vote without complaint. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c4e308e | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c4e308e | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1c4e308e | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c5002bc | type |
The Stoic | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c5002bc | comment |
The Stoic: Similar to the above, Juror #4 is also the most calm and collected of the jurors, never raising his voice or showing strong emotions of any kind. He's not completely stoic, though, as a few scenes evidence. He becomes visibly unnerved while being interrogated by Juror #8, and towards the end, expresses annoyance towards Juror #3 (for his obnoxiousness), Juror #9 (for badgering him with seemingly-inane questions instead of getting to the point), and Juror #10 (for being obviously prejudiced against the defendant, instead of arriving at that conclusion by the exercise of logic). | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c5002bc | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1c5002bc | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1c5002bc | |
12 Angry Men / int_1d7d1b93 | type |
Remake Cameo | |
12 Angry Men / int_1d7d1b93 | comment |
Remake Cameo: More like Remake Reappearance. Joseph Sweeney (Juror #9) and George Voskovec (Juror #11) reprise their roles from the 1954 TV version. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1d7d1b93 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1d7d1b93 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1d7d1b93 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1f6983f7 | type |
Ambiguous Situation | |
12 Angry Men / int_1f6983f7 | comment |
Ambiguous Situation: The killing itself. The audience is never shown if the defendant did murder the victim or if he's innocent. But that's the entire point of the movie, which leads to the Aesop below. | |
12 Angry Men / int_1f6983f7 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_1f6983f7 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_1f6983f7 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2493b31d | type |
Fire-Forged Friends | |
12 Angry Men / int_2493b31d | comment |
Fire-Forged Friends: Jurors #8 and #9, who were the first to vote "not guilty" and swayed most of the others with their arguments, exchange names at the end, implying they've formed a bond through the rigorous deliberation. | |
12 Angry Men / int_2493b31d | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2493b31d | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_2493b31d | |
12 Angry Men / int_24b88e85 | type |
Unwanted Assistance | |
12 Angry Men / int_24b88e85 | comment |
Unwanted Assistance: Near the conclusion, when Jurors #3 and #4 are the last ones still arguing for conviction, #4 is clearly annoyed at having his rational arguments undermined by #3's not-so-rational cheering from over his shoulder. | |
12 Angry Men / int_24b88e85 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_24b88e85 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_24b88e85 | |
12 Angry Men / int_24cf8a0e | type |
Speech-Centric Work | |
12 Angry Men / int_24cf8a0e | comment |
Speech-Centric Work: The film consists of the twelve jurors debating whether or not the defendant is guilty. | |
12 Angry Men / int_24cf8a0e | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_24cf8a0e | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_24cf8a0e | |
12 Angry Men / int_26d1f65f | type |
Verbal Tic | |
12 Angry Men / int_26d1f65f | comment |
Verbal Tic: Juror #10 seems to have one of these, you know what I mean? *sniff* | |
12 Angry Men / int_26d1f65f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_26d1f65f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_26d1f65f | |
12 Angry Men / int_281de59f | type |
Extremely Short Timespan | |
12 Angry Men / int_281de59f | comment |
Extremely Short Timespan: It's not established exactly at what time deliberations started, but it's implied they started no later than noon, through a rainstorm that started late in the afternoon, and finally winding down sometime after 6 pm, of the same day. The editing makes it feel like it's happening in Real Time, but the outside lighting and weather reminds us that it's actually taking a bit longer. | |
12 Angry Men / int_281de59f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_281de59f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_281de59f | |
12 Angry Men / int_28604695 | type |
Rogue Juror | |
12 Angry Men / int_28604695 | comment |
Rogue Juror: If not the Trope Maker, definitely the Trope Codifier. Juror #8 is the sole holdout on a case which appears to indicate that the accused is definitely a murderer. However, as the jury is forced to analyze the evidence in detail, they slowly discover that almost all of it is flawed in some way. Worth noting that, unlike some other examples, the rogue juror isn't convinced of the suspect's innocence either; he just wants to make sure they've done their job properly, as the accused is facing a mandatory death sentence. It leaves the question of the suspect's guilt or innocence ambiguous in the end. However, because there was reasonable doubt, a verdict of "not guilty" is appropriate.note Interestingly, while #8 is trying to get everyone else to do their job properly, he is not. Conducting your own investigation and bringing a weapon into the jury room are both serious juror misconduct. This leads to a bit of Values Dissonance between laypeople and legal professionals watching the same film/play. Towards the end of the film, Juror #3 becomes this for the other side, after all the other jurors have decided there's enough doubt that they can't justify a guilty verdict. | |
12 Angry Men / int_28604695 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_28604695 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_28604695 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a02e5c9 | type |
Guile Hero | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a02e5c9 | comment |
Guile Hero: Juror #8. His smarts kick-start the plot. | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a02e5c9 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a02e5c9 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_2a02e5c9 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a090d00 | type |
Lampshade Hanging | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a090d00 | comment |
Juror #3 is asked to re-enact the stabbing process on Juror #8. Given the tension between the two men, and #3's almost maniacal bloodthirstiness, there's a definite tension as to how "real" #3 will make the re-enactment. Lampshaded by the alarmed reactions of most of the other ten jurors as he draws back the knife. | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a090d00 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2a090d00 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_2a090d00 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f1ddb04 | type |
Perfect Health | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f1ddb04 | comment |
Perfect Health: Averted. Juror #9 has a head cold. It's not a plot point or anything. He just has a head cold. It's one of many distractions that cause some jurors to want to rush through the deliberation and go back to their lives. | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f1ddb04 | featureApplicability |
-1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f1ddb04 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_2f1ddb04 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f3cf3a2 | type |
Stoic Spectacles | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f3cf3a2 | comment |
Stoic Spectacles: Juror #4 is a "rational stockbroker, unflappable, self-assured, and analytical". | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f3cf3a2 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_2f3cf3a2 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_2f3cf3a2 | |
12 Angry Men / int_3322dd48 | type |
Hollywood Law | |
12 Angry Men / int_3322dd48 | comment |
Hollywood Law: Juror #8 states that he went walking in the defendant's neighborhood, and found a copy of the supposedly unique switchblade knife in a local store. He presents it to the jury to prove his point. In a real jury proceeding, the term for this is "juror misconduct." Jurors are not permitted to perform their own investigations, or admit their own evidence (the second knife), and they're really not supposed to consider evidence not presented in court. If it were to come out that #8 did all this, it's possible (though unlikely, given the double jeopardy prohibition) the verdict could be set aside, and #8 could be charged for his actions. There is at least an acknowledgement that #8 broke the law by buying the knife, but nobody brings up that searching for a knife is misconduct. Of course, none of the jurors are lawyers, so it's possible that they didn't recognize the acts as such. In addition to considering evidence not introduced in court, the jurors outright disregard many of the witness testimonies that were introduced in court, for reasons that the prosecutor and defense attorney never actually brought up as possible issues (like the fact that one of the witnesses may or may not have been nearsighted). In Real Life, only a judge has the final say on whether or not statements in court can be considered credible, and jurors aren't supposed to disregard witness testimonies unless a judge instructs them to disregard them. That said, this doesn't always stop it from happening, since once someone has witnessed something, it can't just be erased from their mind. This is why both prosecution and defense have to be careful not to cause situation or statements that could influence the minds of the jury to give their side a disadvantage. The jury seems to be operating under a "slightest possible doubt" basis instead of beyond a reasonable doubt. | |
12 Angry Men / int_3322dd48 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_3322dd48 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_3322dd48 | |
12 Angry Men / int_374c339d | type |
I'll Kill You! | |
12 Angry Men / int_374c339d | comment |
Referring back to the I'll Kill You! example above, Juror #8 afterwards remarks, "You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?" | |
12 Angry Men / int_374c339d | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_374c339d | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_374c339d | |
12 Angry Men / int_392372f9 | type |
Actor Allusion | |
12 Angry Men / int_392372f9 | comment |
Actor Allusion: Juror #3 sarcastically refers to Juror #12 as "the boy in the grey flannel suit." Lee J. Cobb (Juror #3) appeared in the film The Man In The Grey Flannel Suit in the previous year. | |
12 Angry Men / int_392372f9 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_392372f9 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_392372f9 | |
12 Angry Men / int_3e87fc1f | type |
Psychological Projection | |
12 Angry Men / int_3e87fc1f | comment |
Psychological Projection: It becomes clear by the end that the real reason Juror #3 is so insistent on a guilty conviction is because he's projecting his own problems with his son onto the case. | |
12 Angry Men / int_3e87fc1f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_3e87fc1f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_3e87fc1f | |
12 Angry Men / int_4127eb1 | type |
Shut Up, Hannibal! | |
12 Angry Men / int_4127eb1 | comment |
Shut Up, Hannibal!: Juror #10 digs his own grave when he starts shooting his mouth off about how inferior the lower classes are. By the time he's finished, when everyone has clearly stopped listening, this trope — delivered by #4 — is all it takes to shut him up for the rest of the movie. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4127eb1 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4127eb1 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4127eb1 | |
12 Angry Men / int_443b78cd | type |
Tranquil Fury | |
12 Angry Men / int_443b78cd | comment |
Juror #8 catches #10 in a bit of a contradiction early on, which earns him a cold, sarcastic reply. | |
12 Angry Men / int_443b78cd | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_443b78cd | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_443b78cd | |
12 Angry Men / int_443f9d8a | type |
Ask a Stupid Question... | |
12 Angry Men / int_443f9d8a | comment |
Ask a Stupid Question...: | |
12 Angry Men / int_443f9d8a | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_443f9d8a | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_443f9d8a | |
12 Angry Men / int_4499cea4 | type |
SecondhandStorytelling | |
12 Angry Men / int_4499cea4 | comment |
Secondhand Storytelling: Since the film is about a jury deliberating a crime, we only ever seen them talking. All information about the crime is related to us by them discussing it amongst themselves. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4499cea4 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4499cea4 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4499cea4 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4604fd4d | type |
Worthy Opponent | |
12 Angry Men / int_4604fd4d | comment |
Worthy Opponent: Both Juror #8 and #4 debate their points without getting too personal, each seems to be just as factual as the other, and #4 certainly seems to view #8 this way. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4604fd4d | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4604fd4d | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4604fd4d | |
12 Angry Men / int_4781adbb | type |
Jerk with a Heart of Gold | |
12 Angry Men / int_4781adbb | comment |
Jerk with a Heart of Gold: Juror #4 initially comes like a bit of an aloof jerk, but by the end he proves to be one of the more reasonable jurors, calling out #10 for his bigoted rant, changing his verdict when given sensible reason to do so, and clearly regretful at the end when he realizes where he went wrong with his reasoning prior. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4781adbb | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4781adbb | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4781adbb | |
12 Angry Men / int_4971b851 | type |
Aggressive Categorism | |
12 Angry Men / int_4971b851 | comment |
Aggressive Categorism: Juror #10 is one of the last holdouts for a guilty verdict. As time goes on, it becomes clearer and clearer that he doesn't care about the evidence; the defendant is a young man from the slums, and for #10, that is enough to think he's guilty. None of the other jurors, even #3 and #4, agree with him and instead ignore his last rant about the defendant until he runs out of steam. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4971b851 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4971b851 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4971b851 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4ce20451 | type |
Rhetorical Request Blunder | |
12 Angry Men / int_4ce20451 | comment |
Rhetorical Request Blunder: A plot point: The defendant was overheard yelling "I'll Kill You!!" to the victim, who later ended up stabbed to death. Rogue Juror #8 points out that this doesn't necessarily prove the defendant was the murderer, as anyone might say something like that in a fit of anger. To prove the point, Juror 3 later becomes so angry at 8 that he yells "I'll kill you!", to which 8 retorts, "You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?" | |
12 Angry Men / int_4ce20451 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4ce20451 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4ce20451 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4cf9fe88 | type |
Clueless Mystery | |
12 Angry Men / int_4cf9fe88 | comment |
Clueless Mystery: An interesting twist on it: the details all appear on screen, but in the end, we never learn the truth about the murder that led to the trial in the first place, as the ending is ambiguous as to whether or not the defendant was truly guilty.note While he is found not guilty, the jurors themselves even note that they can't be 100% certain that the boy didn't murder his father. They have merely established reasonable doubt to believe that he didn't. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4cf9fe88 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4cf9fe88 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4cf9fe88 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7c4536 | type |
Wham Line | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7c4536 | comment |
Wham Line: Each time a piece of evidence is found to be wanting, a Wham Line usually reveals the flaw, i.e. "No one who had used one of these knives would hold it like that." "What movie did you see that night?" etc. One especially notable one (for how thoroughly it demolishes a key piece of evidence): | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7c4536 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7c4536 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7c4536 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7f703c | type |
Wham Shot | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7f703c | comment |
Wham Shot: Juror #8 pulls out a switchblade and sticks it into the table right next to the "unique" murder weapon, showing that they are identical. | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7f703c | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7f703c | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_4e7f703c | |
12 Angry Men / int_505ec51b | type |
Immigrant Patriotism | |
12 Angry Men / int_505ec51b | comment |
Immigrant Patriotism: Juror #11 takes a moment to gush about the jury trial system, and how it could only happen in a democracy like the United States. They never say where he came from, but the implication is that the country he was from is not a democracy. He also berates #7 for refusing to take the process seriously, and makes a point to make sure he is speaking English more properly than the bigoted natural-born #10. | |
12 Angry Men / int_505ec51b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_505ec51b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_505ec51b | |
12 Angry Men / int_537dd8fe | type |
Affably Evil | |
12 Angry Men / int_537dd8fe | comment |
Affably Evil: For a flexible definition of "evil", since he is more of an antagonist than a villain (although his actions would lead to the death of a kid): Juror #4 is calm, polite, doesn't mock Juror #8 or his doubts, and only brings up logical and factual arguments for his position. He doesn't act out of malice or prejudice, but because he sincerely believes the kid to be guilty. | |
12 Angry Men / int_537dd8fe | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_537dd8fe | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_537dd8fe | |
12 Angry Men / int_539a29a3 | type |
Common Nonsense Jury | |
12 Angry Men / int_539a29a3 | comment |
Common Nonsense Jury: Only barely averted and thoroughly explored. If not for the actions of Juror #8, the accused teen would have been voted "guilty" within a couple of minutes because of things as dumb as racing to get to a baseball game, racism, and misplaced rage from a family dispute. The jurors are forced to admit their skewed priorities as the play goes on. | |
12 Angry Men / int_539a29a3 | featureApplicability |
-1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_539a29a3 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_539a29a3 | |
12 Angry Men / int_549a92e7 | type |
Minimalism | |
12 Angry Men / int_549a92e7 | comment |
Minimalism: Apart from a very short prologue and epilogue, the entire play/film takes place in the jury room (and an adjacent bathroom). | |
12 Angry Men / int_549a92e7 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_549a92e7 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_549a92e7 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5a3b8032 | type |
The Un-Reveal | |
12 Angry Men / int_5a3b8032 | comment |
The Unreveal: Did the boy really kill his father? If he didn't, who did? Since the play and film only see the case from the jurors' perspective (not the police's), it is never discovered. All that is known is that there is reasonable doubt as to the boy's guilt — which, under the laws of the United States, is enough to keep him from being convicted. Truth in Television, of course — jurors not working on an obvious Open-and-Shut Case rarely get "closure" as to whether or not they were right. | |
12 Angry Men / int_5a3b8032 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5a3b8032 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_5a3b8032 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5c385fe1 | type |
Profiling | |
12 Angry Men / int_5c385fe1 | comment |
Profiling: The defendant's background is the main reason Juror #10 wants a guilty verdict. It is not made clear what the background of the defendant is, however, presenting a generalised prejudicial outlook from Juror #10. It is possible that the defendant is of an ethic minority, or belongs to a lower class in the eyes of #10. | |
12 Angry Men / int_5c385fe1 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5c385fe1 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_5c385fe1 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f146203 | type |
Dissonant Serenity | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f146203 | comment |
Dissonant Serenity: Juror #8 remains calm when Juror #3 is pretending to stab him (the other jurors are standing up, worried that #3 is actually going to stab him). | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f146203 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f146203 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_5f146203 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f1999a0 | type |
Building of Adventure | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f1999a0 | comment |
Building of Adventure: Except for the opening and closing scenes in the courtroom itself, the story never leaves the jury room. | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f1999a0 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_5f1999a0 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_5f1999a0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_60b21fa3 | type |
The Lancer | |
12 Angry Men / int_60b21fa3 | comment |
The Lancer: Juror #9 acts as this, to some extent, to Juror #8. #9 is the first person to side with #8, and helps him out when he's arguing with the others. As does #4 to #3. #4 provides logical reasoning for all of #3's passionate arguments, and is one of the last people to change his mind. | |
12 Angry Men / int_60b21fa3 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_60b21fa3 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_60b21fa3 | |
12 Angry Men / int_66faa669 | type |
Silence, You Fool! | |
12 Angry Men / int_66faa669 | comment |
Silence, You Fool!: In the 1957 film, Juror #3 impolitely orders Juror #2 to be quiet, when he interrupts him: | |
12 Angry Men / int_66faa669 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_66faa669 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_66faa669 | |
12 Angry Men / int_69cce3dc | type |
Explain, Explain... Oh, Crap! | |
12 Angry Men / int_69cce3dc | comment |
Explain, Explain... Oh, Crap!: Juror #3 is at first adamant that the old man's testimony is a vital part of the trial, but when it becomes clear that the old man may have been exaggerating what he saw, he says "Half the time he was confused. How can he be positive about anything?" and immediately realizes that he just discredited his own argument. | |
12 Angry Men / int_69cce3dc | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_69cce3dc | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_69cce3dc | |
12 Angry Men / int_6ad1eeb8 | type |
Sliding Scale of Gender Inequality | |
12 Angry Men / int_6ad1eeb8 | comment |
Sliding Scale of Gender Inequality: The only characters are the members of an all-male jury. Some modern versions try to correct this by making the judge a woman. Others simply opt to re-title the play "Twelve Angry Jurors" just so that some of the jury can be women. | |
12 Angry Men / int_6ad1eeb8 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_6ad1eeb8 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_6ad1eeb8 | |
12 Angry Men / int_6bd689ca | type |
Meaningful Echo | |
12 Angry Men / int_6bd689ca | comment |
Meaningful Echo: During Juror #10's racist rant, each of the other jurors turns away from him in disgust and eventually tell him to shut up. When Juror #3 starts shouting at the end, the other jurors listen in silence, as they realize that #3 is in the middle of an emotional breakdown and needs time to let it out and process it. | |
12 Angry Men / int_6bd689ca | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_6bd689ca | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_6bd689ca | |
12 Angry Men / int_71748a39 | type |
Named by the Adaptation | |
12 Angry Men / int_71748a39 | comment |
Named by the Adaptation: None of the jurors were named in the play. In the film, two of them are given names in the epilogue. | |
12 Angry Men / int_71748a39 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_71748a39 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_71748a39 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7335ffa9 | type |
Grey-and-Gray Morality | |
12 Angry Men / int_7335ffa9 | comment |
Grey-and-Gray Morality: Though the pro-acquittal side is painted A Lighter Shade of Grey. | |
12 Angry Men / int_7335ffa9 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7335ffa9 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_7335ffa9 | |
12 Angry Men / int_73733868 | type |
Awesomeness by Analysis | |
12 Angry Men / int_73733868 | comment |
Awesomeness by Analysis: Juror #9, who provides great insights on the eyewitnesses based on their appearances at court, and in turn gives fairly logical reasons for why their testimonies might not be truthful. | |
12 Angry Men / int_73733868 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_73733868 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_73733868 | |
12 Angry Men / int_779009b5 | type |
Beware the Quiet Ones | |
12 Angry Men / int_779009b5 | comment |
Beware the Quiet Ones: Juror #4 is soft-spoken, calm, and polite. He is also the one who sternly answers Juror #10 when he goes on his prejudiced tirade and shuts him up for good. In some versions, it's taken further as he threatens him with physical violence. | |
12 Angry Men / int_779009b5 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_779009b5 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_779009b5 | |
12 Angry Men / int_786d6cf6 | type |
You Wouldn't Shoot Me | |
12 Angry Men / int_786d6cf6 | comment |
You Wouldn't Shoot Me: Juror #3 is asked to re-enact the stabbing process on Juror #8. Given the tension between the two men, and #3's almost maniacal bloodthirstiness, there's a definite tension as to how "real" #3 will make the re-enactment. Lampshaded by the alarmed reactions of most of the other ten jurors as he draws back the knife. Referring back to the I'll Kill You! example above, Juror #8 afterwards remarks, "You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?" | |
12 Angry Men / int_786d6cf6 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_786d6cf6 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_786d6cf6 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7b6e47a5 | type |
Armor-Piercing Question | |
12 Angry Men / int_7b6e47a5 | comment |
Armor-Piercing Question: Juror #8 catches #10 in a bit of a contradiction early on, which earns him a cold, sarcastic reply. A very intense one happens after #8 baits #3 into lashing out at him. | |
12 Angry Men / int_7b6e47a5 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7b6e47a5 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_7b6e47a5 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7d89315b | type |
"The Reason You Suck" Speech | |
12 Angry Men / int_7d89315b | comment |
"The Reason You Suck" Speech: Juror #11 to Juror #7, after the latter changes his vote just to break the deadlock: | |
12 Angry Men / int_7d89315b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7d89315b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_7d89315b | |
12 Angry Men / int_7f6c8e4f | type |
Reverse Grip | |
12 Angry Men / int_7f6c8e4f | comment |
Reverse Grip: Used as a point of contention between the jury. Allegedly the accused stabbed downwards into the victim using the reverse grip. However, Juror #5, who is from the slums, points out that nobody who has experience in knife fights would ever use this with a switchblade, as it would be suicide to pause for a second to change to it in a fight. | |
12 Angry Men / int_7f6c8e4f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7f6c8e4f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_7f6c8e4f | |
12 Angry Men / int_7febc23b | type |
Establishing Character Moment | |
12 Angry Men / int_7febc23b | comment |
Establishing Character Moment: Juror #8 is first seen pondering at the window of the jury room before being called over to begin deliberations. Notably, he isn't shown speaking and chattering excitedly like most of the jurors, hinting that the majority sentiment won't go through as easily as previously thought. During the initial vote, some jurors raise their hands right away to vote guilty, while the rest except for #8 are more reluctant, showing who will be the hardest to win over. | |
12 Angry Men / int_7febc23b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_7febc23b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_7febc23b | |
12 Angry Men / int_8042e814 | type |
Actually Pretty Funny | |
12 Angry Men / int_8042e814 | comment |
Actually Pretty Funny: Downplayed as the character doesn't seem to consider it actually funny, but after the knife display (see Dude, Not Funny! below), Juror #8 doesn't even blink, and agrees that there was no harm done. | |
12 Angry Men / int_8042e814 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8042e814 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_8042e814 | |
12 Angry Men / int_80d0d980 | type |
The Generic Guy | |
12 Angry Men / int_80d0d980 | comment |
The Generic Guy: The jurors don't all get the same amount of focus, but most of them get at least one moment or trait to really set them apart from the others. Juror #1 doesn't really get this so much. He's one of the jurors with the fewest lines and mostly just serves as the one who will officially read out the verdict once it's reached but plays very little role in actually reaching it. Juror #6 also gets very little characterization; the only thing that's ever really revealed about him is the fact that he works as a interior painter. | |
12 Angry Men / int_80d0d980 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_80d0d980 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_80d0d980 | |
12 Angry Men / int_82a64c4b | type |
Adaptational Nice Guy | |
12 Angry Men / int_82a64c4b | comment |
Adaptational Nice Guy: Of all people, Juror #4. In the original 1954 TV movie, when Juror #10 goes on his prejudiced rant towards the end, Juror #4 basically intimidates him into shutting up by telling him that if he opens his mouth again, he (#4) will "split his skull". This makes it seem like #10 only relents because he's too terrified not to. But in the movie, when Juror #10 asks why they aren't listening to him, #4 merely says quietly "We have. Now, sit down and don't open your mouth again." This seems to make #10 realize at last just how much the others despise him, and he shuts up not because he's frightened but because he's ashamed to realise that he doesn't speak for anyone else. | |
12 Angry Men / int_82a64c4b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_82a64c4b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_82a64c4b | |
12 Angry Men / int_8391b1c7 | type |
Artistic License – Law | |
12 Angry Men / int_8391b1c7 | comment |
Artistic License – Law: Juror #8 performs outside research and enters a second knife into the proceeding. US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that this would lead to a mistrial (if the law allowed the jury's deliberations to be revealed). | |
12 Angry Men / int_8391b1c7 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8391b1c7 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_8391b1c7 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8c41d6e9 | type |
Nameless Narrative | |
12 Angry Men / int_8c41d6e9 | comment |
Nameless Narrative: No names are used for any of the jurors, and not even for the victim or defendant. The film added an epilogue not in the play that gives last names for Juror #8 (Davis) and Juror #9 (McCardle). | |
12 Angry Men / int_8c41d6e9 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8c41d6e9 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_8c41d6e9 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8e3b5b4d | type |
Minimalist Cast | |
12 Angry Men / int_8e3b5b4d | comment |
Minimalist Cast: At the beginning of the film, other people (such as the defendant and the judge) are briefly shown, but for the rest of the film, we only see the twelve jurors (and the bailiff, briefly). The play doesn't show anyone but the jurors and the bailiff, with the judge's voice only being heard from off-stage. | |
12 Angry Men / int_8e3b5b4d | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8e3b5b4d | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_8e3b5b4d | |
12 Angry Men / int_8ed5c6e4 | type |
Asshole Victim | |
12 Angry Men / int_8ed5c6e4 | comment |
Asshole Victim: The murder victim was an abusive father. | |
12 Angry Men / int_8ed5c6e4 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_8ed5c6e4 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_8ed5c6e4 | |
12 Angry Men / int_92163e88 | type |
Locked in a Room | |
12 Angry Men / int_92163e88 | comment |
Locked in a Room: A deliberation room. Lampshaded by #5 and #10. | |
12 Angry Men / int_92163e88 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_92163e88 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_92163e88 | |
12 Angry Men / int_957e5fc2 | type |
Villainous Breakdown | |
12 Angry Men / int_957e5fc2 | comment |
Villainous Breakdown: When Juror #10 delivers his famous rant. "Listen... listen to me...." And Juror #3 shortly afterward. Made somewhat more poignant by the reactions of the other jurors; where they reacted to #10's breakdown with silent anger, they watch #3's meltdown with something closer to pity, as most of them realise why he is really pushing for a guilty verdict even as he denies the true reason, not just to the other jurors but to himself. | |
12 Angry Men / int_957e5fc2 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_957e5fc2 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_957e5fc2 | |
12 Angry Men / int_9591377d | type |
Heel Realization | |
12 Angry Men / int_9591377d | comment |
Heel Realization: When, in the middle of his furious insistence that the defendant is guilty, Juror #3 sees the picture of his estranged son and rips it to pieces, you can see in his face that he has just figured out what he was really doing. Vaguely implied for Juror #10. When he rants at length about how "they" (the unspecified social/ethnic group the defendant belongs to) are by nature nothing but a bunch of hotheaded liars and killers, the way all eleven of the other jurors respond with silent open contempt for his views, followed by #4's command to sit down and not say another word causes him to go practically catatonic. He spends the remainder of the deliberation silently staring at nothing, and after #4 changes his vote to not guilty, #10 soon follows. It is left ambiguous, if this means he was actually rethinking his views, or if he just felt defeated. The original teleplay and the Showtime version aren't as ambiguous; when the final vote is taken, #10 flat out says he believes the defendant is guilty, he's just voting "not guilty" cause he's done butting heads with the others. | |
12 Angry Men / int_9591377d | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_9591377d | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_9591377d | |
12 Angry Men / int_96a33f11 | type |
Riddle for the Ages | |
12 Angry Men / int_96a33f11 | comment |
Riddle for the Ages: Who killed the man if the defendant was not guilty? For that matter, is the defendant not guilty in the first place? We never get an answer. Even Juror #8 acknowledges the kid probably is guilty, it's just that "probably" is not "beyond a reasonable doubt." What are the names of the 12 angry men in particular? The movie adaptations add the names Davis and McCardle to Jurors #8 and #9 respectively, but the names of the remaining 10 jurors are left unrevealed. | |
12 Angry Men / int_96a33f11 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_96a33f11 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_96a33f11 | |
12 Angry Men / int_97b30203 | type |
Implied Trope | |
12 Angry Men / int_97b30203 | comment |
Vaguely implied for Juror #10. When he rants at length about how "they" (the unspecified social/ethnic group the defendant belongs to) are by nature nothing but a bunch of hotheaded liars and killers, the way all eleven of the other jurors respond with silent open contempt for his views, followed by #4's command to sit down and not say another word causes him to go practically catatonic. He spends the remainder of the deliberation silently staring at nothing, and after #4 changes his vote to not guilty, #10 soon follows. It is left ambiguous, if this means he was actually rethinking his views, or if he just felt defeated. The original teleplay and the Showtime version aren't as ambiguous; when the final vote is taken, #10 flat out says he believes the defendant is guilty, he's just voting "not guilty" cause he's done butting heads with the others. | |
12 Angry Men / int_97b30203 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_97b30203 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_97b30203 | |
12 Angry Men / int_99ff79ee | type |
Heat Wave | |
12 Angry Men / int_99ff79ee | comment |
Heat Wave: One of the jurors remarks that it's supposed to be the hottest day of the year, and most of them are sweaty and agitated in the poorly-ventilated deliberation room. Things get a little better once they manage to get the wall fan running. | |
12 Angry Men / int_99ff79ee | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_99ff79ee | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_99ff79ee | |
12 Angry Men / int_9b853e85 | type |
Paper Destruction of Anger | |
12 Angry Men / int_9b853e85 | comment |
Paper Destruction of Anger: Juror #3 rips up a photo of his son during his breakdown and then he finally votes not guilty. He was voting "guilty" simply because of the bad relationship he has with his estranged son, not because of the facts. | |
12 Angry Men / int_9b853e85 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_9b853e85 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_9b853e85 | |
12 Angry Men / int_9d12bbc1 | type |
Foreshadowing | |
12 Angry Men / int_9d12bbc1 | comment |
Foreshadowing: #3's breakdown is set up very early in the movie, when he first goes to the cooler and stares at the photo of his son. | |
12 Angry Men / int_9d12bbc1 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_9d12bbc1 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_9d12bbc1 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a0797fb3 | type |
Stunned Silence | |
12 Angry Men / int_a0797fb3 | comment |
Inverted again when Juror #3 breaks himself by going on a similar rant, only to find that the room has gone dead silent over the pitiable wreck he has made of himself. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a0797fb3 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a0797fb3 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a0797fb3 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a1ca3743 | type |
Believing Their Own Lies | |
12 Angry Men / int_a1ca3743 | comment |
Believing Their Own Lies: At the start of the deliberations, Juror #3 opens by claiming to have no personal bias towards the case. It quickly becomes apparent that this is far from the truth, and #3 himself is the last one to realize it. Juror #9 also suggests that this trope could explain why the old man testified that he saw the defendant fleeing the murder scene, when his ability to have done so was severely in doubt. He was so eager for the chance to be part of a murder investigation and trial that it overrode his good sense. Also, for the bespectacled woman who claims to have witnessed the murder itself. At no point does anyone allege that any witnesses deliberately lied, only that they thought they heard or saw something near that time, or heard/saw something that was obscure, and convinced themselves it was the murder. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a1ca3743 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a1ca3743 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a1ca3743 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f168ab | type |
Let Me at Him! | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f168ab | comment |
Let Me at Him!: Juror #3, after being provoked by Juror #8, lunges at him out of rage, only to be held back by Jurors #5, #6 and #7. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f168ab | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f168ab | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f168ab | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f39a9c | type |
Thunder Equals Downpour | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f39a9c | comment |
Thunder Equals Downpour: One thunderclap, cue rainstorm. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f39a9c | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f39a9c | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a5f39a9c | |
12 Angry Men / int_a70223 | type |
Karma Houdini | |
12 Angry Men / int_a70223 | comment |
Karma Houdini: All the Jurors in the end give the same verdict: "not guilty". If the kid is actually guilty, he gets away with murdering his father. If he is genuinely innocent, the real killer is still at large and unsuspected. Of course, within the realm of the movie, the investigation would be considered ongoing, so it's more of a matter of them not covering the part where someone actually gets caught and convicted as guilty, since that's not the focus. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a70223 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a70223 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a70223 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8556a04 | type |
Video Credits | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8556a04 | comment |
Video Credits: Although the jurors each have a number, and they sit in order, these are used to help distinguish the names of actors with their faces. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8556a04 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8556a04 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a8556a04 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8559a9f | type |
RealLife | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8559a9f | comment |
In addition to considering evidence not introduced in court, the jurors outright disregard many of the witness testimonies that were introduced in court, for reasons that the prosecutor and defense attorney never actually brought up as possible issues (like the fact that one of the witnesses may or may not have been nearsighted). In Real Life, only a judge has the final say on whether or not statements in court can be considered credible, and jurors aren't supposed to disregard witness testimonies unless a judge instructs them to disregard them. That said, this doesn't always stop it from happening, since once someone has witnessed something, it can't just be erased from their mind. This is why both prosecution and defense have to be careful not to cause situation or statements that could influence the minds of the jury to give their side a disadvantage. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8559a9f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8559a9f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a8559a9f | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8593e70 | type |
Real Time | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8593e70 | comment |
Real Time: Fully in the play, the film takes it even further, with not only almost all of the movie taking place in real time, but almost all of that period is set in one room. Even more remarkably, it had to be shot four times, each from a different angle with one of the walls removed to accommodate the camera, with the jurors getting progressively more sweaty and dishevelled. When all four angles were cut together it worked perfectly in continuity. | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8593e70 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_a8593e70 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_a8593e70 | |
12 Angry Men / int_abc55125 | type |
Character Filibuster | |
12 Angry Men / int_abc55125 | comment |
Character Filibuster: Juror #10 has a particularly nasty, racism-filled rant against "the likes of him [the accused]" that causes the other jurors to turn away from him one by one, until #4 shuts him up: Juror #3 has a smaller one, but in his case he breaks down all by himself afterwards. | |
12 Angry Men / int_abc55125 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_abc55125 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_abc55125 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ad1db87c | type |
Oh, Crap! | |
12 Angry Men / int_ad1db87c | comment |
Oh, Crap!: Juror #3's face when he realizes that he's just contradicted his own argument subtly, but wonderfully, evokes this sentiment. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ad1db87c | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ad1db87c | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ad1db87c | |
12 Angry Men / int_ae3d6438 | type |
Deadpan Snarker | |
12 Angry Men / int_ae3d6438 | comment |
Deadpan Snarker: Juror #4, who quips back at some of the less-than-logical theories. #7 is a less subtle version, whose hostile wisecracks contribute little to the proceedings except added tension in the room. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ae3d6438 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ae3d6438 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ae3d6438 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b11ac9f5 | type |
Abusive Parents | |
12 Angry Men / int_b11ac9f5 | comment |
Abusive Parents: It's revealed that the murder victim was an abusive dad to the accused. | |
12 Angry Men / int_b11ac9f5 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b11ac9f5 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_b11ac9f5 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b39d5719 | type |
Sadist | |
12 Angry Men / int_b39d5719 | comment |
Sadist: Juror #8 deliberately calls Juror #3 one to rile him up to make a point, that people don't always mean what they say. | |
12 Angry Men / int_b39d5719 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b39d5719 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_b39d5719 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b4a6ae4c | type |
Everyone Has Standards | |
12 Angry Men / int_b4a6ae4c | comment |
Everyone Has Standards: Juror #3 may be vicious and want to see the defendant executed, but even he is unwilling to listen to #10's bigoted tirades. Even Juror #4, who comes off as a Jerkass at times, and is strongly convinced of the defendant's guilt, has had enough of #10's bigotry, and tells him as such in no uncertain terms. Juror #3 is also the first to jump on Juror #7 for changing sides for no reason, and makes it clear that he respects the jury system throughout. He simply doesn't realize that his subconscious bias is the reason he's pushing for conviction. Once he figures it out, he changes his vote to Not Guilty. Juror #8 (and #10) doesn't look too impressed when the jurors (note #1, #3 and #12) are playing a game rather than listening to the evidence. Interestingly, juror #11 provides an heroic example when juror #7 switches sides to what seems to be the new winning one. Realizing that he is only interested in cutting it short, juror #11 is utterly apalled by his attitude and refuses to accept it. | |
12 Angry Men / int_b4a6ae4c | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b4a6ae4c | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_b4a6ae4c | |
12 Angry Men / int_b707726f | type |
Hypocritical Humor | |
12 Angry Men / int_b707726f | comment |
Hypocritical Humor: This exchange, which is even funnier when considering that Juror #11 is an immigrant to the US from Europe. | |
12 Angry Men / int_b707726f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b707726f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_b707726f | |
12 Angry Men / int_b8e42c35 | type |
Notably Quick Deliberation | |
12 Angry Men / int_b8e42c35 | comment |
Notably Quick Deliberation: If not for Juror #8, the jurors would have declared the kid guilty in five minutes, tops. | |
12 Angry Men / int_b8e42c35 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_b8e42c35 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_b8e42c35 | |
12 Angry Men / int_bc54e772 | type |
Fulton Street Folly | |
12 Angry Men / int_bc54e772 | comment |
Fulton Street Folly: The film is set in a New York City courtroom, and the opening and closing scenes were shot on location at the New York State Supreme Court Building in Lower Manhattan. | |
12 Angry Men / int_bc54e772 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_bc54e772 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_bc54e772 | |
12 Angry Men / int_bf110089 | type |
Break Them by Talking | |
12 Angry Men / int_bf110089 | comment |
Break Them by Talking: Played straight initially when Juror #8 baits #3 into lashing out in a rage (thus proving his point about Ineffectual Death Threats). Inverted when Juror #10 goes on a bigoted diatribe, is shunned by everybody in the room one by one, and spends the rest of the film in defeated silence. Inverted again when Juror #3 breaks himself by going on a similar rant, only to find that the room has gone dead silent over the pitiable wreck he has made of himself. | |
12 Angry Men / int_bf110089 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_bf110089 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_bf110089 | |
12 Angry Men / int_c868a42a | type |
Freudian Excuse | |
12 Angry Men / int_c868a42a | comment |
Freudian Excuse: Juror #3 spends the movie continuously trying to convict a young man where there is more and more reasonable doubt for his guilt because his relationship with his son appeared to have gone very sour. It's a classic case of Psychological Projection. He realizes this at the end, though, and changes his stance. | |
12 Angry Men / int_c868a42a | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_c868a42a | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_c868a42a | |
12 Angry Men / int_cbd0ac32 | type |
Environmental Symbolism | |
12 Angry Men / int_cbd0ac32 | comment |
Environmental Symbolism: As tempers rise, the room seems to get more and more claustrophobic. That's not just an effect of the camera: the actual walls of the set were gradually moved closer in as the film goes on, making the room smaller and smaller. | |
12 Angry Men / int_cbd0ac32 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_cbd0ac32 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_cbd0ac32 | |
12 Angry Men / int_cd149b1e | type |
Silent Treatment | |
12 Angry Men / int_cd149b1e | comment |
Silent Treatment: How everyone reacts when Juror #10 flies off the handle about the inferiority of the lower classes. Even the ones who were still in favor of conviction. It shames him enough that he stares off in space quietly in the corner for the rest of the film. | |
12 Angry Men / int_cd149b1e | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_cd149b1e | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_cd149b1e | |
12 Angry Men / int_cdd835ce | type |
Dude, Not Funny! | |
12 Angry Men / int_cdd835ce | comment |
Dude, Not Funny!: The other jurors' reaction to #3 pretending to raise the knife to stab #8, considering the tensions between them. The only exceptions are Juror #4, who simply rolls his eyes at the theatrics, Juror #5, who seems like he's trying to inspect something (he moments later points out the improper handling of a switchblade, another sign the defendant might not be the assailant), and Juror #7, who simply leans forward in his chair, almost as if he hoped it would happen. | |
12 Angry Men / int_cdd835ce | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_cdd835ce | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_cdd835ce | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce0b2b21 | type |
Monochrome Casting | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce0b2b21 | comment |
Monochrome Casting: Perhaps unsurprisingly for a film made in The '50s, the jury is all-white (although one is an immigrant with a noticeable accent). Later productions often avert it. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce0b2b21 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce0b2b21 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ce0b2b21 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce9da072 | type |
Realistic Diction Is Unrealistic | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce9da072 | comment |
Realistic Diction Is Unrealistic: While there are plenty of impassioned speeches, the trope is less severe than most examples since the characters often stutter or pause at key points. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce9da072 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ce9da072 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ce9da072 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d36b9a69 | type |
Precious Photo | |
12 Angry Men / int_d36b9a69 | comment |
Precious Photo: Juror #3 tears up his photo of himself with a young man (assumed to be his son, who has either left home after a fight or died) in a fit of rage, and quickly regrets it. | |
12 Angry Men / int_d36b9a69 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d36b9a69 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_d36b9a69 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d5139ac | type |
Reality Has No Soundtrack | |
12 Angry Men / int_d5139ac | comment |
Reality Has No Soundtrack: The music plays four times. | |
12 Angry Men / int_d5139ac | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d5139ac | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_d5139ac | |
12 Angry Men / int_d56607ad | type |
Jury Duty | |
12 Angry Men / int_d56607ad | comment |
Jury Duty: Well, yeah. The characters run the whole gamut of taking the duty very seriously (Juror #8's stance on this drives the whole plot, and Juror #11 later claims the responsibility to be one of the greatest things about American democracy) to being almost entirely dismissive of it (Juror #12 is more concerned with doodling and talking about his work than he is with the deliberations, and Juror #7 is mostly upset that he's missing a baseball game; both get called out for this). Notably, Jurors #3 and #10 are taking it seriously, but are too hung up on their own emotional baggage to approach it objectively. | |
12 Angry Men / int_d56607ad | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d56607ad | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_d56607ad | |
12 Angry Men / int_d83a7229 | type |
"Number of Objects" Title | |
12 Angry Men / int_d83a7229 | comment |
"Number of Objects" Title: 12 Angry Men. | |
12 Angry Men / int_d83a7229 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_d83a7229 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_d83a7229 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e3cee2e7 | type |
Empathic Environment | |
12 Angry Men / int_e3cee2e7 | comment |
Empathic Environment: The rainstorm. And to a lesser extent, the fan, which finally starts up when the votes start to swing in favor of acquittal. | |
12 Angry Men / int_e3cee2e7 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e3cee2e7 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_e3cee2e7 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e484500b | type |
Scary Minority Suspect | |
12 Angry Men / int_e484500b | comment |
Scary Minority Suspect: Very little is known about the defendant except that he's some kind of ethnic minority. Despite this, most of the jurors are eager to say he's guilty and get the trial over with, although only the most vindictive juror admits to outright racism. | |
12 Angry Men / int_e484500b | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e484500b | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_e484500b | |
12 Angry Men / int_e4bb68b8 | type |
The Charmer | |
12 Angry Men / int_e4bb68b8 | comment |
The Charmer: Juror #12, a smartly-dressed Motor Mouth adman, presents this way early on. He is very friendly to the other jurors and tries to defuse the tension when they fight. He loses this trait and turns hesitant and unsure later on, flip-flopping his vote according to who cowed him last. | |
12 Angry Men / int_e4bb68b8 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e4bb68b8 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_e4bb68b8 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e7e558 | type |
The Oner | |
12 Angry Men / int_e7e558 | comment |
The Oner: A few, such as one towards the beginning, in which each of the jurors establishes himself as the camera pans around the room and focuses briefly on several different conversations; and one when Juror #8 goes to wash his hands and other characters duck into the bathroom to chat with him. | |
12 Angry Men / int_e7e558 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_e7e558 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_e7e558 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ea6f361f | type |
You Are Number 6 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ea6f361f | comment |
You Are Number 6: The jurors are only ever referred to by their numbers, though Jurors #8 and #9 introduce their names to each other at the end of the film adaptations. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ea6f361f | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ea6f361f | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ea6f361f | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb0a92ca | type |
Ineffectual Death Threats | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb0a92ca | comment |
Ineffectual Death Threats: Invoked. Juror #3 fixates on the evidence that a neighbor heard the defendant yell "I'll kill you!" during a fight, and when it's pointed out that people say that sort of thing all the time and don't mean it, Juror #3 says, "Oh no... if you say that, you mean it." Juror #8 baits him with insults until Juror #3 attacks him and must be held back by the others. | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb0a92ca | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb0a92ca | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_eb0a92ca | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb8ec7c8 | type |
Jerkass | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb8ec7c8 | comment |
Jerkass: Juror #3 is argumentative, dismissive of others, and voraciously adamant in seeing the defendant get executed. Juror #10 doesn't have any logical reason for his guilty vote; he's just extremely prejudiced, to the point where he eventually drops all pretenses and goes on a lengthy bigoted tirade to which the other jurors refuse to listen. Juror #7. Aside from constantly insulting the other jurors with his constant pithy remarks, he doesn't care what the decision of the jury is. He's only concerned with catching a New York Yankees baseball game. At least the most vicious jurors voted guilty because they believed in it. That said, when called out on this, he does say that he doesn't believe the accused is guilty. Fortunately, the game is rained out during the deliberation, so he can relax and pay attention for once. | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb8ec7c8 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_eb8ec7c8 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_eb8ec7c8 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f42f2adc | type |
Corner of Woe | |
12 Angry Men / int_f42f2adc | comment |
Corner of Woe: Juror #10 retreats to one when, after one of his bigoted rants goes too far, Juror #4 shuts him up. From that point on, #10 rarely participates in any of the deliberations, only weakly showing an acknowledgement that his vote is "not guilty" when a poll is taken (ironically, after #4 changes his vote after the woman's testimony about clearly seeing the killing is discredited). | |
12 Angry Men / int_f42f2adc | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f42f2adc | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_f42f2adc | |
12 Angry Men / int_f62b8d00 | type |
Sinister Switchblade | |
12 Angry Men / int_f62b8d00 | comment |
Sinister Switchblade: The murder weapon is a switchblade, but the blade's reputation even extends to its non-usage; Juror #4 is appalled when Juror #8 pulls out an identical blade to prove that there are more copies of the supposedly rare knife than previously thought. | |
12 Angry Men / int_f62b8d00 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f62b8d00 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_f62b8d00 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f8c08650 | type |
Motive = Conclusive Evidence | |
12 Angry Men / int_f8c08650 | comment |
Motive = Conclusive Evidence: This is used as one of the main thrusts behind the drive to convict the defendant. The defendant had yelled "I'LL KILL YOU!" at the victim shortly before the victim had died, and this was taken as "evidence". Juror #3, the one most adamant for a conviction, argued that no one says something like that unless they truly mean it, and during the course of the film, Juror #8 gets #3 so angry that he lunges at #8, screaming "I'll kill him! I'LL KILL HIM!" before #8, remaining calm and cool, throws this line of reasoning right back in his face: "You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?" | |
12 Angry Men / int_f8c08650 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f8c08650 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_f8c08650 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f95439a9 | type |
Dingy Trainside Apartment | |
12 Angry Men / int_f95439a9 | comment |
Dingy Trainside Apartment: This is discussed as a plot point in the testimony of a witness: she supposedly heard and saw a murder through a passing elevated train going by between her window and the accused's. | |
12 Angry Men / int_f95439a9 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_f95439a9 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_f95439a9 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ffb79066 | type |
Chromosome Casting | |
12 Angry Men / int_ffb79066 | comment |
Chromosome Casting: All of the jurors are male, since only men served on juries when it was written. It's right in the title. However, theatrical adaptations now often avert this. | |
12 Angry Men / int_ffb79066 | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_ffb79066 | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_ffb79066 | |
12 Angry Men / int_name | type |
ItemName | |
12 Angry Men / int_name | comment |
||
12 Angry Men / int_name | featureApplicability |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men / int_name | featureConfidence |
1.0 | |
12 Angry Men | hasFeature |
12 Angry Men / int_name | |
12 Angry Men / int_name | itemName |
12 Angry Men |
The following is a list of statements referring to the current page from other pages.
Copyright of DBTropes.org wrapper 2009-2013 DFKI Knowledge Management. Imprint. - Thanks to Bakken&Baeck for hosting. Contact.
Copyright of data TVTropes.org contributors under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright of data TVTropes.org contributors under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.